<span>Social Darwinian is </span>the theory that individuals, groups, and people are subject to the same Darwinian laws of natural selection as plants and animals.
∵∴∵answer∵∴∵
1. This Bible translator prepared new Greek and Latin
translations of the New Testament, - Erasmus
2. This German prince provided Martin Luther with a safe
a place to work at Wartburg. - Frederick III
3. This pope excommunicated Martin Luther and summoned
him to the Diet of Worms. - Pope Leo X
4. He was the first to translate the Bible into English, - William Tyndale
5. This Cambridge theologian convinced Henry VIII that his marriage to Katherine was invalid. - Thomas Cranmer
6. This theologian convinced the king that the pope had no right to control church practices in England. - Thomas Cromwell
/.) (.\
/)\| |/(\
//)/ hope this helps -Tom \(\\
/'"^" "^"`\
I would like brainliest if I deserve it plz
Answer:
The statement is describing the usual difference in trade policy that exists between monarchies and republics.
Explanation:
The excerpt comes from the Spirit of the Laws, by Montesquieu, who was a French philosopher who promoted republicanism and liberalism.
In the text, Montesqueiu is explaining than in monarchies, trade is very restricted, and is usually only allowed for luxury goods like perfums, spices, or silk clothes, because these goods are used by the nobility as a symbol of their power and status.
In monarchies, for the rest of the population, trade is restricted. The common people therefore cannot access goods from abroad, or can only do so at a very high cost.
In republics, Montesquieu says, trade tends to be more open. Merchants become the ones who do most of the trade, guided by their economic ideas. The merchants therefore obtain many goods from abroad, that both the nobility and the commoner can acquire for a lower price.
In conclusion, Montesquieu is using the argument for trade as another reason to support republics over monarchies.
A <span>key difference between the earliest works of history, such as homers the odyssey and modern works of history is that modern works are far more objective, and truthful. Ancient works of history used to greatly embellish facts for the sake of entertainment. </span><span />