1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Monica [59]
2 years ago
14

The Stone and Rickie Fowler and the Walk of a Lifetime both focus on wishes. Using evidence from the text, compare and contrast

how Maibon and Anthony Trudel react when their wishes are granted.
English
1 answer:
Korvikt [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Maibon and Anthony Trudel react in different ways when their wishes are granted.

Maibon was pleased at first since he will never be old. As the days passed by, he realized that every day was the same and that he was not aging nor living his life. This leads him to realize that his wish will not make his dream come true and will not make him happy. We can see this when he says  “I want no more of it. Whatever may happen, let it happen. That’s better than nothing happening at all. I’ve had my share of being young; I’ll take my share of being old. And when I come to the end of my days, at least I can say I’ve lived each one of them.”

On the other side, there is Anthony Trudel, a teenage boy with cancer who wanted to meet his idol Rickie Fouler. Anthony was happy because he could watch his favorite golf player in action and talk with him. He did not want a photo with him.  He wanted to see Fouler play and interact with others since this was what he admired of him. We can see this when Anthony says " What I won’t forget is unflappability. His cool. His understanding of what he got to do. His studious and laid-back demeanor as he walked a few feet from his hero, taking mental notes on his swing, on how he read the greens, on his putting stroke". Also, when he says “That’s one of the reasons I’ve always liked him,” said Trudel, “it’s the way he treats people.”  We can see that Anthony wants to learn and aspires to be like him. He is living every day of his life has the probability of meeting Rickie Fowler again due to the short distance between residences.

In conclusion, Maibon asked for something that did not allow him to live his life but made him realized that time is essential in every life and makes things precious. Something that Trudel knew and, that is why he used his days to make worthy memories.

Explanation:

In this essay, we compare and contrast two texts that share the topic of whishes. It is important to cite evidence from the text to support what we are stating and use the correct language.

Finally, we write our last paragraph, which is the conclusion. In this paragraph, we state what we could learn by comparing these two scenarios.

You might be interested in
Explain this quote: <br> Have no friends not equal to yourself - confucius
zavuch27 [327]
That means in my opinion that if you have a friend that isn't down for you or isn't like you then u shouldn't be friends with them
7 0
3 years ago
How is the underlined pronoun used in the sentence? . whose is underlined. I wonder whose phone is on the kitchen table.. . A..
USPshnik [31]
The answer is B. direct object
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on details in The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone, what helped scholars determine that the demotic language was related to the
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Explanation:

What helped scholars determine that the demotic language was related to the Egyptian language?

Based on details in The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone, what event helped scholars determine that the demotic language was related to the Egyptian language? Examples of the demotic language previously appear on rolls of papyrus. The scholars call it demotic, meaning "of the people."

3 0
3 years ago
Look at the following writing sample. Classify it as formal, informal, or semi-formal. My dog is just driving me up a wall; I ca
xeze [42]

The answer to your question is semi-formal .

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is difference between present perfect and past simple?​
rosijanka [135]
The present perfect refers to an act that took place in the past, from the perspective of the present. "I have eaten" means that at some point in the past, eating occurred. Now (at the present), it is over.

The simple present tells you about what's going on currently. "I eat" means that the act of eating is ongoing. (Though it can also refer to a habitual act; I may not be eating right at this instant, but it's the sort of thing that I could be doing right now, because the eating isn't complete.)
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • It's 10 o'clock, and I'm crying because I'm so stressed. I have a ton of assignments due tomorrow, and I'm frustrated that I can
    5·1 answer
  • Why does conflict arise between Smaug and the Lake-men? A. The Master tries to convince Smaug to part with some of the treasure.
    13·1 answer
  • What can be inferred from this excerpt from Oliver Twist by Charles dickens?
    13·1 answer
  • Our planet more in the future,
    8·1 answer
  • Who wanna chattttttttttttttttt
    10·2 answers
  • Just because she did not follow him as he demanded of his duchess. Leaves one asking if he'd ever told his wife how he felt, did
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP, WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    8·1 answer
  • How should approach a poem that you plan to revise?
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS ONE QUESTION
    14·1 answer
  • Pls if u follow me i will give u brainliest​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!