Answer:
what are you talking about???
Step-by-step explanation:
brainliest and chill bro
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is B.
Use the sum-product pattern
2+3−3−9
Common factor from the two pairs
2+3−3−9x2+3x−3x−9
(+3)−3(+3)
Rewrite in factored form
(+3)−3(+3)
Solution:
(−3)(+3)
‘Hope it Helps!
Answer:
No there cannot be.
Step-by-step explanation:
In explaining this question, I would like us to take into account who the barber is,
" the barber is the one who shaves all those, and those only, who do not shave themselves".
This barber cannot be in existence because who would shave him? If he should shave himself then there is a violation of the rule which says he shaves only those who do not shave themselves. If he shaves himself then he ceases to be a barber. And if he does not shave himself then he happens to be under those who must be shaved by the barber, because of what the rule says. But then he is the barber.
This lead us to a contradiction.
Neither is possible so there is no such barber.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
First: multiply both sides by 4. 4 times c is 4c and the other sides cancels out as you are doing the inverse operation of division
Then, you have 
Subtract both sides by a squared
DO NOT TAKE THE SQUARE ROOT! This is because it is a squared plus 3b so you have to do the inverse of addition
From that you get 
Finally, divide both sides by 3.
You get
I worked it out and I got south Africa
