It shouldn’t be any longer vertically so that should be your answer
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Straight angle is equal to 180°
Angle x, 60° and 80° form a straight angle.
<u>Then we have following equation to solve for x:</u>
- x + 60° + 80° = 180°
- x + 140° = 180°
- x = 180° - 140°
- x = 40°
Answer:
You did not include your graph, therefore I will explain in the step-by-step everything you should need to know.
Step-by-step explanation:
The standard slope formula is y=mx + b, where m = slope (rise/run) and b = the y intercept.
Using this knowledge, we know that this line has a slope of 5, or 5/1, which means that you will go up 5 and 1 to the right. Since there is no + b part, that means b = 0, so the line begins at 0,0. So, using this information, possible points include 0,0, 5,1, 10,2, 15,3, etc.
The answer is $2.34. I attached an explanation thing below. Forgive my ugly handwriting.
Complete question :
Two researchers, Jaime and Mariya, are each constructing confidence intervals for the proportion of a population who is left-handed. They find the point estimate is 0.13. Each independently constructed a confidence interval based on the point estimate, but Jaime’s interval has a lower bound of 0.097 and an upper bound of 0.163, while Mariya’s interval has a lower bound of 0.117 and an upper bound of 0.173. Which interval is wrong? Why?
Answer:
Mariya's interval
Step-by-step explanation:
Point estimate = 0.13
Mariya's confidence interval :
Lower boundary = 0.117
Upper boundary = 0.173
Jamie's confidence interval :
Lower boundary = 0.097
Upper boundary = 0.163
The correct confidence interval should have an average value equal to the value of the point estimate ;
Jamie's confidence interval average :
(0.097 + 0.163) / 2 = 0.26 / 2 = 0.13
Mariya's confidence interval average :
(0.117 + 0.173) / 2 = 0.29 / 2 = 0.145
Based on the confidence interval average obtained we can conclude that Mariya's interval is wrong as it the average obtained is greater than the point estimate.
0.145 > 0.13
