1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tanzania [10]
3 years ago
7

Who were the leaders for each side in the amiens offensive

History
2 answers:
Harrizon [31]3 years ago
4 0
The Battle of Amiens, also known as the Third Battle of Picardy (French: 3ème Bataille de Picardie), was the opening phase of the Allied offensive which began on 8 August 1918, later known as the Hundred Days Offensive, that ultimately led to the end of the First World War. Allied forces advanced over 11 kilometres (7 mi) on the first day, one of the greatest advances of the war, with Gen Henry Rawlinson's British Fourth Army (with 9 of its 19 divisions supplied by the fast moving Australian Corps of Lt Gen John Monash and Canadian Corps of Lt Gen Arthur Currie) playing the decisive role. The battle is also notable for its effects on both sides' morale and the large number of surrendering German forces. This led Erich Ludendorff to later describe the first day of the battle as "the black day of the German Army". Amiens was one of the first major battles involving armoured warfare.
SSSSS [86.1K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

•Ferdinand Foch.

•Douglas Haig.

•Henry Rawlinson.

•Marie-Eugène Debeney.

•John Monash.

•Arthur Currie.

•Charles Kavanagh.

hope it's help

<h3>#carryONlearning </h3>
You might be interested in
Lated<br> To avoid future wars, Wilson believed that military<br> forces should be
Firdavs [7]

Answer:

Diarmed

Explanation:

In the aftermath of world war 1 which lasted between 1914 to 1918. There were efforts to prevent future war. It is on this note that the President of the United States Woodrow Wilson declared that To avoid future wars, Wilson believed that military forces should be disarmed.

Wilson reason that one of the main reasons for the cause of war is because many European soldiers readily armed to fight wars.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a first draft essay or final draft essay?
kirza4 [7]

Answer:

The first draft contains everything you wanted to say.

while the final draft should be brimming with significant detail.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the loss of the silk road trigger Portuguese exploration??? Somebody help me ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!
Elanso [62]
A glance at a world map shows that Europe is in fact a small peninsula jutting from the enormous landmass we call "Asia." It was the Greeks who first divided the world into Europe and Asia, with the waters of the Bosporus as the conventional dividing line. Yet the language they spoke originated, like ours, in the vast steppe areas beyond the Caspian. Men of neolithic times, who moved freely from the borders of China to the Atlantic coasts of Europe, would have found the division meaningless.
At the beginning of recorded history, some time in the third millenium BC, one of the Indo-European or Indo-Aryan speaking peoples of these steppelands succeeded in domesticating the horse, revolutionizing warfare and transforming themselves almost overnight into a formidable fighting force. Wave after wave of horse nomads swept across Europe and western Asia, meeting resistance only from the sedentary civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt, which were able to withstand the assault only by adopting chariot warfare - if not mounted cavalry - themselves.

These nomads, speaking closely related languages and sharing a common social organization, were the ancestors of, among others, the Greeks, Romans, Persians, the Indo-Aryan speaking conquerors of India, and of many other lesser-known peoples who were later to play an important role in the history of the various segments of the Silk Roads.

Time and distance obscured the common geographical and linguistic origin of these widely scattered peoples, and it was not until the 19th century that the relationships among all their languages was fully worked out and their homeland in the Asian steppes identified. When Alexander fought Darius at Gaugamela, he had no notion that the Persians, at least linguistically, were cousins of the Greeks. The Greek and Roman historians who later chronicled his campaigns derived a great deal of dramatic play from the contrast between stern Macedonian virtue and the decadent luxury of the East, between Greek freedom and Persian slavery, between Europe and Asia. These attitudes penetrated deep into the European consciousness - they surface occasionally today - and erected a mental barrier at times almost as impassable as the Pamir Mountains that protected the farthest outposts of China from those the Chinese called "the western barbarians."

For the Chinese, like the Greeks - but perhaps with more reason - divided the world into civilized and barbarian. They, like their counterparts in India, Mesopotamia and Egypt, had had to face the fierce mounted bowmen of the steppes, and to survive had had to adopt their enemies' methods of warfare.

The pattern established in the second millennium BC - the settled, agriculturally-based urban civilizations of China, India and the Middle East regularly exposed to attack by mounted horsemen from Central Asia - did not end with the settling of the Indo-European speaking nomads. As they were transformed, as a result of the success of their own conquests, into urban civilized peoples themselves - Greeks, Romans, Persians and Indians - they in their turn had to defend themselves against new attacks by mounted horsemen from the Eurasian steppes - Parthians, Huns, Turks and finally Mongols. The last great wave of invasion out of Central Asia occurred in the early 15th century of our era, when Tamerlane and his Turkic- and Mongolian-speaking hordes devastated the Middle East.

It is no wonder that Ibn Khaldun, the 14th-century Arab philosopher of history, saw the history of the Middle East in terms of urban peoples periodically assaulted by mounted nomads, who then adopted the civilized ways of the peoples they conquered, became thereby decadent and in their turn submitted to a new wave of nomadic invaders. Had Chinese historians been able to read Ibn Khaldun, they would have found his paradigm borne out by their own experience.

No fully satisfactory explanation has ever been offered for the periodic explosion of nomadic peoples from - or through - Central Asia, but the pattern is clear: The region has historically been a sort of dynamo generating population movements that have affected Europe, Asia and America since the beginning of human occupation of the Eurasian landmass.

The Chinese fear of the peoples to the west was therefore not without foundation. In the third century BC the short-lived but powerful Qin Dynasty linked up a series of earlier bulwarks and formed the Great Wall, effectively separating the settled and cultivated lands of China from the nomadic herdsmen without. The Great Wall stretches from Gansu to Manchuria, a distance of 2,400 kilometers (1,500 miles). It was an effective defence against nomads who lacked both siege
4 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP!!!
liraira [26]

Answer:

One advantage of having representation from districts within a state is that it allows for each of the smaller districts views to be expressed. This is important because i representative of a mostly city district near the mountians is not likely to know what a rural district needs.

5 0
3 years ago
1) Which of these statements is MOST true of Texas after the oil boom of the late 1800s and early 1900s? A) new corporations for
enot [183]

The oil boom in Texas brought about dramatic changes in the economy during the period of late 1800s and early 1900s.

Explanation:

  • The oil boom of which was also called gusher age brought about several economic changes.
  • The discovery of huge oil reserves bought rapid industrialization, with the turn of century urbanization was seen with new corporations and new infrastructures being built to keep pace with the ushering oil business.
  • After the end of World War 2, the state was industrialized, amongst which Houston was the one to be most benefited in this boom, having the largest reserves of natural oil. This period brought significant changes in the commercial makeover of Texas.
  • During the end of 18th centuy and beginning of early 19th century, started with the Oil era in Texas, having opened the first oil field in Corsicana in 1894 .
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does democracy ensure the well-being of the people?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the coercive act made colonists mad
    6·1 answer
  • Which language, spoken in South Africa, is a mixture of Dutch, English, and African dialects
    8·2 answers
  • Changing your social class through academic achievement or business
    13·1 answer
  • What impact did this case have in America
    8·2 answers
  • Can you write what you analys and evaluate of honor crimes happening in other parts of the world?
    7·1 answer
  • Which phrase describes the income effect?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Battle of Britain impact World War II?
    15·1 answer
  • What are the four main points in the decline of Rome. Give an example for each point
    7·1 answer
  • A historían who compares the expansion of political systems to the expansion of economic system is organizing history by
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!