1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vichka [17]
3 years ago
5

Give an easy explaination on everything involving categorical syllogisms

Law
1 answer:
Leno4ka [110]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Consider, for example, the categorical syllogism: No geese are felines. ... Clearly, “Some birds are not felines” is the conclusion of this syllogism. The major term of the syllogism is “felines” (the predicate term of its conclusion), so “No geese are felines” (the premise in which “felines” appears) is its major premise.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
1. When one party in a contract agrees to release the other party from performance and enters
fgiga [73]
1. Accord and satisfaction

That’s the only one I will answer but I hoped it helped a little
6 0
3 years ago
Choose the term that best matches the description given.
MArishka [77]

Answer:copyright

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How far should you stop from The nearest railroad crossing if a flagger is warning of a upcoming train
Alisiya [41]
15-50 feet from the track of the railroad
3 0
3 years ago
Anyone is in Dav school? Noida
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

no

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The defendant was arrested for driving while intoxicated. Incident to arrest, police searched the center console of the defendan
elena55 [62]

Answer:

The search was lawful.

(Check Explanation).

Explanation:

The case that is described in the question above is similar to the case of New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981).

In this case of police searching without warrant, many people or let me say defendants do argue that their right under the fourth and fourteenth Amendment act has been violated.

The search was lawful because the defendant broke one of the traffic laws that is driving while being intoxicated. This give the officer the right to " impound" the defendant's car and search for possible evidence which is known as an inventory search.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is NOT true about public trust?
    5·1 answer
  • What did the chickne crass the road
    15·2 answers
  • After the initial walk-through, who is now in authority of the crime scene, securing the safety of both people and crime
    15·1 answer
  • A republican form of government means that
    10·2 answers
  • Four (4) liabilities of incoming and outgoing partners​
    14·1 answer
  • Dwi penalties in New Mexico for Interlock
    7·1 answer
  • URGENT 40 POINTS
    12·2 answers
  • Who is currently the president?
    10·2 answers
  • Why should people not vote?
    8·2 answers
  • Question 8 (10 points)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!