Walter Chaplinsky was taken into custody by a police officer who wanted to prevent further public disturbance. While being taken to the police station, he proceeded to insult the police officer after receiving equal treatment from the crowd who was allegedly attacking him. The court denied him First Amendment because it considered that the insults produced by Chaplinsky did not contribute to any "expression of ideas".
Despite considering that it would be a correct action to apply this sort of action on a broader scale, it would certainly lead to the emergence of numerous court cases similar to this one. This would mean considerable additional workload to the courts, hindering the entity's efficiency.
Explanation:
hello I m bored what's up?????????
u can ask mod if u wanna delete ur acc
Fundamental attribution error defines a tendency to underestimate the effects of external or situational causes of behavior and to overestimate the effects of internal or personal causes.
Fundamental attribution error (FAE), also referred to as correspondence bias or attribution effect in social psychology, is the propensity for people to overemphasise dispositional and personality-based explanations for an individual's observed behaviour while underplaying situational and environmental explanations. The term "tendency to believe that what people do reflects who they are" has been used to characterise this effect, which is the tendency to overattribute people's actions (what they do or say) to their personalities and underattribute them to the circumstance or context. The mistake is in assuming that someone's actions are exclusively indicative of their personality rather than that they are partly indicative of it and primarily by external factors.
Learn more about Fundamental attribution error
brainly.com/question/15466443
#SPJ4
Answer: D. Certain rights can never be taken away
