The correct answer is D.
As you can see, the exponential function grows by doubling the previous output with each increment of the input: start with 1, you double it to get 2, then you double it to get 4, 8 and so on.
On the other hand, the linear function adds 7 with each step. This means that the exponential function will eventually reach and pass the linear one, and will definitely be grater from that point on. In fact, if we continue the table, we get
and you can see how the exponential growth is much faster than the linear one.
<span>n = 11<span>.
Explanation:
Let m be the number of boxes Mark sells and a be the number of boxes Ann sells.
Since Mark sells 10 less than n, m = n-10. Since Ann sells 2 less than n, a = n-2.
Together, they sold n-10+n-2=2n-12 boxes.
We know that they sold less than n boxes, so our inequality would be
2n-12<n.
To solve this, subtract n from both sides:
2n-12-n<n-n; n-12<0.
Add 12 to both sides:
n-12+12<0+12; n<12.
This means there were less than 12 boxes. The next number down is 11; this woks because Mark sold 10 less than n; 11-10=1. Mark sold at least 1 box.
If n=10, however, 10-10=0; this doesn't work, because Mark did sell at least 1 box. </span></span>
36 donuts (2 1/2 dozen) = $8.00
So, you divide 8 by 36 and you get about 22¢ for each donut. Then, you do .22 x 12 which equals $2.64.
One dozen donuts = $2.64
Answer:
These two things have litterally nothing to do with eachother
Step-by-step explanation:
50% chance i guess?
He paid ...
-- The cost of the lunches (100% = 1.00 of it)
-- 15% of the cost as a tip (15% = 0.15 of it)
-- 12% of the cost as sales tax (12% = 0.12 of it)
Total that he paid = (1.00 + 0.15 + 0.12) = 1.27 of $248.40
= $315.47 .
Trevor is one generous guy !
