Answer:
$6,200
Explanation:
The computation of the total cost assigned to the ending work in process inventory is shown below:
= Units completed of materials × units material cost + unit conversion cost × completion percentage × units completed of material
= $2.50 × 2,000 units + $1.50 × 2,000 units × 40%
= $5,000 + $1,200
= $6,200
The 2,000 units is come from
= 5,000 units + 3,000 units - 6,000 units
= 2,000 units
Generally speaking, the taxpayer can deduct his alimony payment but not his child support payment. He may, however, be entitled to claim the child as a dependent, although this is beyond the scope of the question.
We can deduct the alimony payment but not the child support payment. Smith paid Goode $20,000 in 2017, although he owes 24,000. The adjusted gross income depends only on how much Alimony he paid.
If he paid the full $6,000 alimony and only 14,000 of child support, he can deduct the $6,000 for an adjusted gross income of 50,000- 6,000= $46,000.
If, for example, he paid the full $18,000 in child support and only 2,000 in alimony, he can only deduct the $2,000 for an adjusted gross income of 50,000 - 2,000 =48,000.
Answer:
1. If the units are more than the 5,129 units, than the Victoria is better
2. If the units are less than the 5,129 units, than the Perth is better
Explanation:
In this question, we have to compute the break even units by taking the difference of fixed cost and the variable cost which is shown below:
Break even points = Change in fixed cost ÷ change in variable cost per unit
where,
Change in fixed cost = $1,000,000 - $800,000 = $200,000
Change in variable cost per unit = $112 - $73 = $39
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $200,000 ÷ $39 per unit
= 5,129 units
If the units are more than the 5,129 units, than the Victoria is better
If the units are less than the 5,129 units, than the Perth is better
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
a) The In-house purchasing cost last year is
= Fixed costs + Variable costs
=$85,000 + Total number of purchase orders × cost per order
= $85,000 + 1400 × 15
= $106,000
b)
The outsourcing cost is
Outsourcing cost = Fixed costs +Variable costs
= $100,000 + Total number of purchase orders × cost per order
= $100,000 + 1400 × 5
= $107,000
c) Total number of purchase orders = 1600
In-house purchasing cost = 85,000 + 1600 × $15 = $109000
Outsourcing cost = $100,000 + 1600 × $5 = $108000
Yes, David should outsource as the outsourcing cost is less than the in-house purchasing cost.
The correct answer should be Option C: 30 graphic T-shirts on sale for $10
.