Answer:
inconsistency
Explanation:
In argument or logic, inconsistency often referred as internal contradiction or logical inconsistency is a term of a fallacious argument, whereby two or more propositions are asserted that cannot both possibly be true.
Hence, in this case, being described as voluble, verbose, long winded and loquacious is contradictory to being described as an individual who has never utter more than twelve words sentence before.
Therefore the argument is rather considered as Inconsistency
Although textile mills and tobacco factories emerged in the South during this time, the plans for a New South largely failed. By 1900, per-capita income in the South was forty percent less than the national average, and rural poverty persisted across much of the South well into the twentieth century.
Answer: <em>Role Fixation </em>
Explanation:
From the given case/scenario we can state that this an example of role fixation. Role fixation is known as or referred to as acting out or portrayal of specific role and thus the role alone irrespective of what the circumstance or situation might ask or require. Role fixation under a decision making group can tend to occur or take place when an individual will move from a group to another.
Answer:
You could include Herbert's Simon's satisficing and Amos Tversky's elimination-by-aspect heuristic rules.
From Satisficing strategy, you must decide which are your goals, what do you want to achieve through social invitations.
By doing this, you are setting an aspiration level. Then, you choose the alternative that satisfies your aspiration.
On the other hand, you can use elimination-by-aspects heuristic strategy to reduce the number of alternatives that do not meet the aspiration level.
We made our houses out of poplar bark and mud put together with animal fur inside for extra warmth. #native answer from me a native Cherokee
