1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ryzh [129]
3 years ago
6

Six-year-old shirley, a witness to a robbery, was asked to testify at the trial. the defense argued that her testimony would be

invalid because:
Social Studies
1 answer:
WINSTONCH [101]3 years ago
4 0
The reason that Shirley's testimony was invalid because she's a minor and by that, that memories about the robbery that she remembers could harm her and would most likely be susceptible to the suggestion. That is why the court would make her testimony as invalid and wouldn't consider it in any way even though she is the witness of the robbery.
You might be interested in
True or false did ghana and mali divide their providences
Naily [24]

Answer:

false.

Explanation:

the Mali Empire became stronger and took over surrounding kingdoms including the Empire of Ghana.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
‘Subsidiary Alliance introduced by Lord Wellesley was the most effective
Nitella [24]

Answer:

Subsidiary Alliance introduced by Lord Wellesley was the most effective

instrument for the expansion of British territory in India.’ Justify the

statement.Subsidiary Alliance was basically a treaty between the British East India Company and the Indian princely states, by virtue of which the Indian kingdoms lost their sovereignty to the English. It also was a major process that led to the building of the British Empire in India. It was framed by Lord Wellesley, the Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805. It was actually used for the first time by the French Governor-General Marquis Dupleix.

The Nawab of Awadh was the first ruler to enter into the subsidiary alliance with the British after the Battle of Buxar. However, the Nizam of Hyderabad was the first to accept a well-framed subsidiary alliance.Features of the Subsidiary Alliance Treaty

The subsidiary alliance in India was planned by Lord Wellesley, but this term was introduced by French Governor Dupleix.

An Indian ruler entering into Subsidiary Alliance with the British had to dissolve his own armed forces and accept British forces in his territory.

He also had to pay for the British army’s maintenance. If he failed to make the payment, a portion of his territory would be taken away and ceded to the British.

In return, the British would protect the Indian state against any foreign attack or internal revolt.

The British promised non-interference in internal affairs of the Indian state but this was rarely kept.

The Indian state could not enter into any alliance with any other foreign power.

He could also not employ any other foreign nationals other than Englishmen in his service. And, if he were employing any, on the signing of the alliance, he had to terminate them from his service. The idea was to curb the influence of the French.

The Indian state could also not enter into any political connection with another Indian state without British approval.

The Indian ruler, thus, lost all powers in respect of foreign affairs and the military.

He virtually lost all his independence and became a British ‘protectorate’.

A British Resident was also stationed in the Indian Court.

Effects of the Subsidiary Alliance

As a result of Indian rulers disbanding their armies, many people were rendered unemployed.

Many Indian states lost their independence and slowly, most parts of India were coming under British control.

The Nizam of Hyderabad was the first to accept the Subsidiary Alliance in 1798.

Lord Clive also introduced the subsidiary system in Oudh and the Treaty of Allahabad was signed where the British promised the Oudh territory from enemies like Marathas.

Order in which the Indian States entered into Subsidiary Alliances

Hyderabad (1798)

Mysore (1799 – After Tipu Sultan was defeated in the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War)

Tanjore (1799)

Awadh (1801)

Peshwa (Marathas) (1802)

Scindia (Marathas) (1803)

Gaekwad (Marathas) (1803)

6 0
2 years ago
Which European countries/explorers were sent to Mexico?
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés (c. 1485-1547)

Explanation:

known for conquering the Aztecs and claiming Mexico on behalf of Spain

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Quizlet The major difference between a republic and a democracy is that ______. Group of answer choices a) popular sovereignty i
fiasKO [112]

Answer:

d) in a republic, elected individuals, rather than citizens themselves, have the direct power to make most governmental decisions

Explanation:

In a republic state, the power is held by the people and their elected representatives, who choose a president instead of a monarch. On the other hand, a democracy is a system formed by the whole population, who usually chooses their representatives. As a result, the direct power in a republic is held by the people's representatives in the Congress, while power in a democracy is typically held by the population itself.

7 0
2 years ago
Since our perceiving lenses are typically subjective and biased, our beliefs about the world are often subjective and biased as
mel-nik [20]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

The perceiving lenses can be defined as a frame from which we see or view the world around us. Perception can result in biases.

<u>Our perception is indeed subjective and biased because we see or view things only through the lenses of our experiences. This bias affects our beliefs also about the world because our perceptions are solely shaped by our experiences. And if one has had a bad experience with an event, it will badly shape our perception, which, in turn, will affect our beliefs about the world. </u>

So, the given statement is true.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Paleo – Indians adapt after the Ice Age ended? Select all that apply.
    12·1 answer
  • Which is true about the Supreme Court?
    10·1 answer
  • According to a 1936 opinion poll on death penalty opinion in the united states, what percent of americans were in favor of the d
    10·1 answer
  • When it comes to forensic science, which statement would be an example of modernist thinking?
    15·1 answer
  • Aaccording to charles spearman, it is one's __________ intelligence that produces the positive correlations found between vocabu
    10·1 answer
  • Who found Mississippi not naïtve Americans?
    15·2 answers
  • Where were many of the colonial towns located?
    7·2 answers
  • Scholars in various disciplines study and explain human sexuality in different ways. Identify the statements that would be more
    10·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of hypotheses in the hypothetico-deductive method?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain supporting relationships as a positive lifestyle enhancement strategy.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!