1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sonbull [250]
2 years ago
6

Am i the only one who doesnt understand the questionsaw​

Law
1 answer:
ikadub [295]2 years ago
6 0
I never understand these questions
You might be interested in
How do lawmakers feel about lobbyists?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

"The relationship between lobbyists and lawmakers is complicated. On one hand, lobbyists pursue relationships with lawmakers in order to shape legislation so that it benefits clients who would be affected by new laws or regulations. On the other hand, lobbyists are frequently targeted by lawmakers as sources of campaign money, which the lobbyists feel beholden to give to improve their clients' prospects of success. "

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Common Law
Anika [276]
The answer to your question is (D)
8 0
2 years ago
Which Supreme Court decision set a precedent forcing police officers to determine if a suspect is an active, violent threat befo
eduard

Answer:

The answer is C........

8 0
2 years ago
if the action is based on new york state law, does the new york trial court have both subject and personal jurisdiction over the
kifflom [539]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Every state court in the United States have jurisdiction over the persons within the territory. The court must have both personal jurisdiction as well as subject jurisdiction so as to have a jurisdiction over a case.

Any court can exercise personal jurisdiction over any defendant unless the statute exists in forum state which explicitly give authorization to the court to have personal jurisdiction over that particular defendant. A defendant must not be a resident of the state in order to have a personal jurisdiction over him by the court.

8 0
3 years ago
Which Amendment to the Constitution (Specifically in the Bill of Rights) is the most important, why do you believe that?
ella [17]
This is more of a personal preference but here’s what I think: I think the first amendment is the most important because that is 1 large point of freedom that everybody uses daily. The freedom of speech allows us to state our ideas, protect ourselves, get things done, make us individuals and unique, and a lot more. If we didn’t have our first amendment then the rest of the amendments wouldn’t be used to its full effect at all.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 8. What is the main job of a party whip?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a true statement about criminal cases?
    6·2 answers
  • Woonzie ufhuglhurlghuqcfhnughioa rniohunffioufreyguneghergvenoanvhuariovhuniesobgunvioerahnovuerio
    14·1 answer
  • Do you believe we should have mandatory minimums why or why not?<br> Answer in a paragraph
    14·1 answer
  • The system on some vehicles adjust order to create better balance while driving at high speed?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the difference between an EMT and a Paramedic?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be the best title for this image?
    10·1 answer
  • Do you think the benefits of transitioning from coded talk, specifically 10-codes, to plain language communication outweigh the
    11·1 answer
  • A man buy a land for $ 1,500 after 15 years sold it for $ 45,000 how much he owes the IRS?
    7·1 answer
  • The idea that crime is a persons choice is
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!