The ideas and philosophies that explain the origin of law and its justification are called <u>jurisprudence</u><u>.</u> It is the concept that differentiates public from private law.
What holds true about jurisprudence?
Jurisprudence is not the law itself but a philosophy of the law. Several theories that assist explain the beginnings of law and its justification have evolved over the years. These legal theories (or philosophies) are referred to as jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is not the law itself but a philosophy of the law.
Positive law jurisprudence:
It thinks that law is only the state's orders enforced through force. Proper law Jurisprudence holds that the only thing that constitutes law is the state's orders accompanied by force and penalties. It runs counter to the natural law school of thought.
Learn more about jurisprudence here:
brainly.com/question/14612573
#SPJ4
Answer:
If they feel like they are going to get out in prison or if they think that they are about to be proven guilty. they may make a plea deal so they can get the defendants help if they know something the prosecutor needs to know for the case.
It is a true statement that the board nursing will typically use mediation to resolve first instances of relatively minor violations.
<h3>What is a
mediation?</h3>
This refers to an interactive process whereby a third party helps in resolving conflict between disputing parties through the use of specialized communication.
Therefore, that act of mediating by the board will help to resolve first instances of relatively minor violations.
Read more about mediation
<em>brainly.com/question/25850228</em>
#SPJ1
No, the charge would be aggravated Assult because it was with a weapon his attorney could try to use temporary insanity but there’s a high chance that wouldn’t succeed
Answer:
If this is a true or false question then the answer is false
there are many ways a trial can still be had; here is one example...
Explanation:
A murder conviction without a body is an instance of a person being convicted of murder despite the absence of the victim's body. Circumstantial and forensic evidence are prominent in such convictions. ... In all cases, unless otherwise noted, the remains of the victims were never recovered.
hope this helps :)
may I get brainliest please?
