According to dutch researcher, fons trompenaars, "individualism" refers to people regarding themselves as individuals, while "<span>Communitarianism " </span>refers to people regarding themselves as part of a group.
One of the most sizzling contentions in social philosophy nowadays is whether communitarianism or individualism is the more suitable hypothesis for depicting the connection between the individual and society. Extensively, we may state that individualism is the view that every person (except just people) has, and should see himself as having, moral hugeness and natural rights. Communitarianism is the view that networks additionally have moral noteworthiness and certain rights.
The options available are:
A. Import oriented economy
B. Lack of infrastructure
C. Problems with immigration
D. Civil wars
Answer:
B. Lack of infrastructure
D. Civil wars
Explanation:
Lack of infrastructure in Africa is one of the major problem that prevents Africa from being able to fully utilize its resources, this because there is not massive and robust factory infrastructures that can process many of its natural resources into refined and final resources. For example, in terms of crude oil and natural gas, there is no substantial refinery in Africa to process it to final products.
Civil wars is also one of the bane that is preventing the Africa from harnessing its resources, as civil wars leads to vandalization of the little infrastructures that is present there, it also affects the government policies, destroys human lives or resources, and scare away both local and foreign investors.
Immigration problems has nothing to do with the utilization of resources, as many Nldeveloped Nations faced the same problems, such as USA with the influx of Mexicans trooping into the country for greener pastures.
It is not import oriented economy either, because, import oriented economy is also one of the byproducts of lack of infrastructure.
The conscious mind can be compared to <u>short term memory</u>.
hope this helps!
What is the question?
Step by step explanation:
Answer:
in an urban area Migration results in a more dense population
less job availabilities
less housing
easy transportation
I'm rural areas migration can result in
more spacious area
poor transportation
less gorvernment facilities/infrastructure
harder labour
do I need to explain more because I think these are just examples
