Sectionalism became very tensed in the late 1940s because of the separation of the North and the South because of the slavery. People in the North were focusing on industrializing, urbanizing, and building factories while the people from the South concentrated in agriculture. The Southerners was claiming that the North's factories weren't treating everyone fairly and lead into a war.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options provided, we can say the following.
John Marshall's approach was different from the role envisioned for the court by the writers of the Constitution in that Marshall believed the United States Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not.
John Marshall was a federalist. Thomas Jefferson was not. He was an anti-federalist. Then, Marshall considered the idea of a strong central government. On the other side, Jefferson thought that a strong government was not the better option for a new nation, and even worse, a strong federal government could turn into a tyranny.
Poland. Just learned about this, and as far as I know Britain, France, and Italy all benefited from it
Answer: Religious teachings
Explanation:
I play study island and i got that answer soooo.......
