Answer:
there is a valid contract, but there has been no breach of that contract by the University or by Joe.
Explanation:
Joe met all the requirements the university required of course candidates that Joe would like to take. Although Joe seems to be an excellent candidate, he was not approved, while people with grades below him were proven. This sounds like an unfair case, but this was a situation where a valid contract exists, but there was no breach of that contract by the University or Joe. This is because despite Joe's selection criteria, the university stated that other criteria (chosen by the university itself) would be chosen to select candidates. Therefore it can be stated that Joe did not meet these criteria and therefore was not selected.
Answer/Explanation:
This is in fact false, since the leader in a theocracy also has duties of a regular leader, not just a model of a deity.
I hope this helped!!
~ Penny
Answer:
The federal courts were empowered to intervene.
Explanation:
As a result of the 14th Amendment, the federal courts gained the power to intervene in the area to impose equal protection of the laws. The courts were also allowed to import certain rights which promoted freedom of speech, freedom of religion, protection from unreasonable and unfair treatment and punishment. It promoted equal protection for the well-being of citizens and encouraged harmony to make the area peaceful.
Answer:
Social is a theoretical subject. Hence, theory plays an important role. Before starting the preparations for your exams, make sure to read the chapters first. You do not need to know the chapters in detail but a brief knowledge of all the chapters will always be helpful.
Explanation:
