Answer: Option B
Explanation: Opportunity cost refers to the of loss of profit when an individual or firm chooses one alternative over other.
The statement in the given case, depicts the opportunity cost one has to pay of using the scarce resources that could be sued on different alternatives.
The lunch is never free depicts that one could have used it in other alternatives that may have produced some economic benefits.
Hence, the correct option is B.
Answer:
1) 2 minutes
2) 7 minutes
3) Zero ( 0 ) minutes
4) yes
5) zero ( 0 ) minutes
Explanation:
1) Time required to serve
= 2 minutes
2) The operator will begin processing the fourth customer at 7 minutes
3) The fifth customer will wait in line for zero ( 0 ) minutes
4) Yes the sixth customer will get served right away
5) The average waiting time for the 6 simulated customers is Zero ( 0 )
Attached below is the simulation of the six arrivals
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
Answer:
Option A, buy less of X and more of Y is correct.
Explanation:
The amount that Mr. Rational is going to spend = $27
Quantity of good X = 5 units
Price of good X (Px) = $3 per unit
Marginal utility of 5th unit of X (MUx) = 30
Quantity of good Y = 6 units
Price of good Y (Py) = $2 per unit
Marginal utility of 6th unit of Y (MUy) = 18
So good x will be substituted for y in order to reach the consumer equilibrium.
Thus, Option a. buy less of X and more of Y is correct.
