Answer:
2, 4, and 5 refers to scientific revolution while on the other hand, the remaining statements shows scientific observation.
Explanation:
Cloning has the potential to significantly benefit a great many people, so it should not be considered immoral or risky is refers as scientific observation.
A scientist thinks that he might find serious inconsistencies in the fossil record if he conducts an excavation in a new location is refers scientific explanation because explanation is needed for it.
The rocks present in western Africa and eastern South America formed at the same place and at the same time is scientific observation because the scientists takes the data.
Even if modern organisms are found in ancient portions of the fossil record, this wouldn't challenge the theory of evolution in any way is refers to scientific explanation.
The cloning of organisms is an exciting area of study, and more resources should be be devoted to it so it is refers as scientific explanation.
The age, type, and composition of ancient rocks in western Africa are nearly identical to the age, type, and composition of rocks in eastern South America is scientific observation which is taken by the scientist through research.
D. A duck flies to another pond.
The above sentence is an example of emigration. Emigration refers to moving from one area to another for a long or permanent period. In this instance, a duck is leaving the pond it originally resided in (along a population other ducks) in order to reside in another pond. Therefore, it can be said that the duck "emigrated".
An oxygen atom would be the smallest particle representing hydrogen peroxide.
hope that helps :)
It was the famous Theodor Escherich who is a famous German bacteriologist that discovered the E. coli and was also known for his research in the area of protein synthesis. In addition to that, Theodor Escherich discovered the bacteria type when he examined its samples from a patient suffering from gastroenteritis.
San Francisco has an opportunity to reap tremendous economic, environmental, and health benefits by adopting recent advances in “green building”—benefits that will only increase in value over time. Many standard building design, construction, operation, and renovation practices are outmoded, inefficient, costly, and have adverse health and economic effects. The shift to new, environmentally sensitive practices would maintain San Francisco’s status as a leader in urban planning and environmental innovation. A shift to green buildings is also vital to enhancing San Francisco’s livability for its residents, workers, and visitors.
