Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
The correct option is D.
Ration refers to a fixed amount of a particular commodity which is officially allowed during a time of shortage such as the one experience during war time. A similar word that can be used instead of ration is portion.
Answer:
The answer would be A. Yep.
Explanation:
Answer:
- The priest told everyone to be quiet and listen to their words.
- She ordered the boys not play on the grass.
- They asked her if she would have the dress ready by tomorrow evening.
- She asked why she wasn't sent a friend request
- she asked the interviewer to repeat the question
- the teacher told him not to waste his time
- the boss told the employees to get out of the room
- He exclaimed about failing his test.
- She exclaimed about the beautiful dress
- Warren told me yesterday he walks 10 km daily.
- Reno mentions that they come here many times.
Explanation:
Indirect speech is a grammatical mechanism for reporting the content of another utterance without directly quoting it.
