<span>1. What are some conflicts or issues surrounding immigration and multiculturalism in the U.S. and the world?
</span>Some conflicts or issues surrounding immigration and multiculturalism in the U.S. and the world are determined by fears and prejudice around immigration, and some true facts about the economy and social changes. The main issues that many countries have are that either there is supposedly not space for everyone, or that immigrants do not add value to the population.<span>
Can these issues be resolved?
Of course, they could be resolved. It is a complex problem, but first and foremost we have to address the cause of the migration and understand the motive of these people. Then, we can find solutions appropriate for everyone. As for multiculturalism, only education can help us understand that mixing culture is a plus value, not the contrary.
Why or why not?
Because it is a problem that is not going away if we do not anything, it will become only worse. So, it is appropriate to sit and think about what we can do to properly address the issue in a way that works for everyone. Just reject this issue is not going to solve the problem as well, solutions come from understanding.
2. Migration significantly changes populations.
Migration historically changes populations, as people from different culture live together tradition, language, and everything that make a population unique change as different elements shapes together. The most adequate example is perhaps language, as today American, while remaining English, as some forms that derives straight from past migration. </span>
Answer:
b. The defendant's conduct was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's emotional distress
Explanation:
The act must be intentional, offensive and it could not possibly be considered as a mistake or joke which led to emotional distress in the plaintiff. That is, the emotional distress experienced by the plaintiff must be linked to the conducts/actions of the defendant,
3) Nelson Mandela. Hope this helps (I would research him though just in case)
That statement is true.
The purpose of the first person mechanism is to enchance player's experience so they could feel like they're a part of the virtual world where the characters currently in.
But, many psychologists stated thas this might increase the tendency to normalize the usage of weapons in real life.
