1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fed [463]
3 years ago
12

Use the sentence to answer the question.

English
1 answer:
earnstyle [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is a choice (i think)

Explanation:

The answer should be a choice because the conjunction "or" shows a choice of either a soccer ball or soccer video game.

You might be interested in
What argument is Gandhi making in this excerpt? How does he construct and support this argument? Font Sizes
horrorfan [7]
Gandhi's trial for sedition, and the subsequent imprisonment that began in March 1922 and ended with his release in January of 1924, marked the first time that he had faced prosecution in India. The judge, C.N. Broomfield, was uncertain what to do with his famous prisoner–Gandhi was clearly guilty as charged, and willingly admitted as much, even going so far as to ask for the heaviest possible sentence. Like many Englishmen, Broomfield developed a liking for the Mahatma, commenting, "even those who differ from you in politics look upon you as a man of high ideals and of noble and even saintly life." He gave Gandhi the lightest sentence possible: six years in prison, which would be later reduced to just two years.

Willingness to accept imprisonment was, of course, an integral part of satyagraha, and Gandhi was perfectly content while in prison. His captors allowed him a spinning wheel and reading material, and save for a bout of appendicitis (which actually hastened his release), he was, he wrote to a friend, "happy as a bird."

Still, it must be noted that during his two-year imprisonment, Gandhi's great nonviolent revolution essentially fell apart. Non-cooperation gradually died away as Indians drifted back to their jobs and routines; the Congress leaders, notably Motilal Nehru and C.R. Das, were participating in local government again; worst of all, Hindu-Muslim unity had fallen apart, and violence rocked many communities. The struggle for Indian independence had run aground on the immense, seemingly insuperable problem of disunity among Indians, who had never been a nation in the Western sense, and remained divided by caste, language, and most of all, religion.

Gandhi's greatest achievement, throughout the '20s, '30s and '40s, was to overcome these differences, to unify India by making himself the symbol of unity. Of course, he never explicitly claimed this role–to do so would have been anathema to his selfless philosophy–yet it was undeniably Gandhi's person, more than the slogans of nationalism and liberation, that united Brahmins and untouchables, Hindus and Muslims in the struggle against the British. His amazing personal determination served as a beacon to all–his behavior after leaving prison is a perfect example: no sooner had he left the trying conditions of prison than he immediately commended a three-week fast requesting peace between the warring religious factions, an event that captured the imagination of the world and indeed went a long way toward easing tensions between Hindus and Muslims. His "soul-force" may well have been the only thing that could bring all Indians together, and he used it to amazing effect.

Even as Gandhi served to unify the Indian people, his figure served to expose the contradictions within the British position on the subcontinent. For while the members of Gandhi's home-rule movement strengthened their arguments by pointing to the oppression of the British Viceroys, those Viceroys attempting to quell the Gandhi phenomenon in fact failed because of a policy not oppressive enough. Theirs was a liberal empire in the end, and they were raised in a liberal tradition that prized freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly; thus they could not counter satyagraha and stay true to themselves. Had Gandhi practiced satyagraha in, say, Stalin's Soviet Union or Hitler's Germany–or had the British been willing to violate their own liberal principles and imprison him for life, deport him, or even execute him–the struggle for independence might have taken a dramatically different turn. But then, such a crackdown was never a realistic possibility. Indeed, most of his British antagonists genuinely liked Gandhi, and by the 1920s, weary of war and empire, most of them had reconciled themselves to some sort of home rule for India in the near future. Independence was coming, in one shape or another, despite the resistance of die-hard imperialists in Britain, because the British had lost the will to sustain their empire; and yet the Viceroys, governors and Secretaries of State were still not willing to give India total independence.

8 0
3 years ago
Which poet addresses his sonnets to stella
RUDIKE [14]
Sidney addresses his sonnets to stella
5 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP ASAP!!!!!
Masja [62]

Answer:

C. By including details about the enviroment

5 0
3 years ago
in the bass the river and sheila mant, how does the narrator's regret for his choices as a teenager affect his future
azamat

The narrator's regret makes him more thoughtful and reflective about his choices and the people he will be involved with in the future.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • "The Bass, the River, and Sheila Mant," tells the story of a fisherman who is in love with his neighbor, Sheila, and invites her on a date.
  • She accepts the invites, but hates the moment when she finds out that the date will be on his boat.
  • He says that he likes fishing and being on the boat, in the water, but realizes that Sheila doesn't share this feeling and that he's not enjoying the ride.
  • At this point, a very large fish pulls the fishing net that the fisherman left in the boat. This causes the boat to shake violently and the fisherman must decide whether to hold the fish or to hold Sheila so she doesn't fall into the water.
  • He decides to hold Sheila but regrets it.

The fisherman regrets this decision because he loves fishing and that fish would be a great victory for his life, Sheila, however, did not seem all that interesting.

This makes the narrator rethink his actions for the future and rethink the people he wants to be close to him, as it is better to avoid people who despise his interests, like Sheila.

More information:

brainly.com/question/24843057?referrer=searchResults

brainly.com/question/18197257?referrer=searchResults

6 0
2 years ago
He could see the river like THE SILVER TRACK
BlackZzzverrR [31]
B similes as and like are similes
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain why creating study materials is "half the studying." Defend why, or why not, you think this is an important step in the
    6·2 answers
  • When cotton clothing is permeated, or soaked through, with water, it stays wet and can freeze in cold weather. Based on context
    8·2 answers
  • Please define sincerely.
    14·2 answers
  • Why does binomial nomenclature use Latin?it was a scientific languageit was a universally spoken languageit was a language of st
    13·1 answer
  • Why is it important to know the difference between cause and effect?<br> Please answer asap
    10·2 answers
  • A(n)<br> is made during research to tell the facts about the source one is using.
    6·1 answer
  • 'ocean of tears won't bring him back'.........what figure if speech is this expression
    6·2 answers
  • I need another way to write this sentence. (I will give Brainliest)
    6·1 answer
  • What does the phrase in persona Christi mean to a priest's daily
    13·1 answer
  • How do stereotypes affect a way a culture lives
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!