Literature can give them facts and info they need to study on a test. So they can also support the holidays that were created during the event also. Thats all.
According to james marcia, the status of adolescents who consider various identity alternatives, but never commit to one or never even consider identity options in any conscious way is called "'identity diffusion."
<h3>What is identity diffusion?</h3>
Identity diffusion is among four identity status updates defined in the 1960s by psychologist James Marcia. Identity diffusion typically occurs during adolescence, when individuals attempt to form their personalities, but it can occur later in life.
Some key features regarding the identity diffusion are-
- Identity diffusion happens when a student has not committed to and is not working to form an identity.
- Many people go through and probably grow out of an identity crisis in early adolescence or in childhood. Long-term completely get rid is possible, however.
- Marcia examined identity formation along two aspects:
- if the individual has gone through with a decision-making period, known as a crisis, and
- if the individual has committed to specific occupational options or ideological beliefs.
- Marcia's emphasis on occupation & ideology, in particular, stemmed from Erikson's proposal that one's occupation and commitment to specific values and beliefs are fundamental components of identity.
To know more about the identity diffusion, here
brainly.com/question/4412284
#SPJ4
Duties of house rules committee are just like that of a traffic cop.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The duties of the house rules committee are to see what is in order and what is not in order. It also has to see the scheduling of the bills on the floor of the house which are coming from the committees of the policies and the fiscal committees.
It is done to schedule everything properly and make sure that this schedule is followed. So it is just like a traffic cop making things put in order and make sure that the order is followed properly.
The statement is true that the state of Arizona can sue the state of California over Colorado river water to the United States Supreme Court and can hear the case for the first time. In fact there was a case that happened in 1982 and was decided on 1983.
