Concentrated ownership of land by minority elite
Unless there are specific choices I can only offer you a list of potential answers.
Sherman Act (1890), Federal Trade Commission Act (1914), and the Clayton Act (1914).
The Sherman Act outlawed all forms of monopolization and any attempts to do so. It also set strict penalties for any and all violations of this law.
The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 created the Federal Trade Commission which oversaw national business practices.
The Clayton Act addresses more specific points but especially focuses on preventing monopolies through regulation of mergers and acquisitions. It also goes on to prevent discriminatory pricing and dealings.
Further reading can be found on:
https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws
Answer:
The official British reply to the colonial case on representation was that the colonies were “virtually” represented in Parliament in the same sense that the large voteless majority of the British public was represented by those who did vote. To this Otis snorted that, if the majority of the British people did not have the vote, they ought to have it. The idea of colonial members of Parliament, several times suggested, was never a likely solution because of problems of time and distance and because, from the colonists’ point of view, colonial members would not have adequate influence.
It not in effect because it made the slaves seem less than people and also because if south wants a vote to pass they could force the slaves to agree with them.
Answer: A developed country would create a multinational corporation with locations in an underdeveloped country to bring others there towards the country.
Explanation: This then leads to further economical development within the developed country. The open jobs that are in the developed country can also be filled with the people immigrating to the developed country.
