What natural resource was discovered in Texas on 10 January 1901 at Spindletop Hill by mining engineer Anthony Lucas

Put them in order please. i need the help

MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

CHINA INDIA EGYPT ITALY GREECE

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If the Christian armies had lost to the Muslims in Spain in the Reconquista had never happened, Would Europeans have sailed to t

Lena [83]

Answer:

Hey there!

The answer is no. If the spanish reconquest had failed, they would not be able to hold onto the iberian peninsula, which was ultimately where most of the voyagers to the new world began their journeys.

Let me know if this helps :)

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

NEED HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!! Use the information from the previous tasks to compose a five-paragraph blog post about the person you t

My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

The era of revolutions is characterized as the first stage of the 19th century and presents several changes in world society. This was because it was during this era that the concepts of freedom were disseminated in Europe, with repercussions in other regions of the planet, resulting in many changes in the views of monarchy and popular sovereignty.

This era was marked by the development of many social groups that fought for some of their rights. These groups had leaders who were extremely important for the development of their struggle and consequently for success. Among these leaders one of the most notable Maximilien Robespierre, who had a strong impact on his country, France.

Robespierre was a French jurist and politician, he was the leader of the Jaconins during one of the most tense periods of the French revolution, which justifies his popularity, since he had to face numerous challenges in the period known as "period of terror". Robespierre was a strong supporter of freedom. This influenced him to defend Jews, Protestants, artists, the right to vote, the opposition to slavery and the death penalty. He created several speeches on these topics, with correct and convincing arguments, thus attracting a large number of supporters and becoming a revolutionary leader and leader of the Jacobins.

After the Fall of the Bastille and the death of King Louis XVI and his wife, Marie Antoinette, Robespierre witnesses a moment of intense political stability in his country, to protect himself and his allies he begins to seek to establish his influence more and more stronger, in addition to causing strong political persecution to its opponents. At that moment, the Public Salvation Committee and the Revolutionary Court are created, which should help to implement the concepts of equality revolutionaries in the country, besides allowing the distribution of quality public education, the adoption of the concept of secular state and public hospitals with high quality standards. However, due to Robespierre's political persecution of his enemies, these committees lived a place to judge acts considered anri-revolutionaries, and the guilty individuals were taken to the guillotine. This moment became known as the period of terror or Jacobean terror.

Robespierre's policy was considered abusive and displeased many revolutionaries. They accused him of adopting dictatorial practices and tried to remove him from power, when they succeeded, ordered him and his supporters to be arrested. At the time of the arrest there was great confusion and Robespierre and some allies tried to throw themselves out of the window, some succeeded, but a shot by the guards hit him in the jaw, which weakened him and prevented him from escaping. He was tried for his actions and taken to the guillotine. After his death, France was governed by a Directorate and years later the joining of the bourgeoisie with the army promoted the rise of the government of Napoleon Bonaparte.

8 0

3 years ago

How was frostbite treated during world war 2

dexar [7]

They would cut of the limp that had the frostbite in order to stop it from hurting the victim and to stop it from spreading to the rest of the body. This is also known as decapitation.

7 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP ASAP I NEED THIS BEFORE 1, PLEASE HELP ME. ;-;

beks73 [17]

Answer:

DIFFERENCES

Geopolitical

China's heartland was far larger and more cohesive, geographically and culturally, than Rome's. Rome had as

its heartland only central Italy, and even after conquering Italy, it held just that single peninsula bounded by

the Alps Mountains and the Mediterranean Sea. In the time of Augustus in Rome and the Han dynasty in

China, the Roman and Chinese empires each held about 60 million people, but in Rome only a few of these

millions were in Italy. In China virtually all were in "inner China," 90 percent of them in the North China Plain.

Longevity and Persistence

Rome's empire rose, fell, and was gone, although it lived on as a concept. China's empire has lasted for the

last two thousand years. Dynasties have come and gone, and sometimes the empire has broken into

fragments, but finally the empire endured as a single political entity. Today, although without an emperor,

China's geopolitical unity continues.

Policy and Powers of Assimilation

As China moved both north and south, it assimilated a great number of the peoples it invaded and

conquered. Non-ethnic Chinese were absorbed culturally and biologically. Many of the 95 percent of today's

Chinese population who are called "Han" are descended from ancestors who were not. The empire was held

together by Confucian and Buddhist ideology, supported by the power of the emperor and his armies. Rome's

empire was held together by law and backed by military power. Selected non-Romans could gain citizenship

under law, but ethnically and culturally the conquered peoples remained "other." Intermarriage with noncitizens was usually forbidden. Rome maintained the cultural distinctions far more than did China. .

SIMILARITIES

Relations with Barbarians

Both empires faced nomadic groups from central Asia who threatened and penetrated their boundaries.

Indeed, the Huns, who invaded Europe, and the Xiongnu, who invaded China, may have belonged to the same

ethnic group. Both empires settled the "Barbarians" near their borders and enlisted them in the imperial

armies. In both cases, the Barbarians came to hold great power. Ultimately, however, they dismembered the

Roman Empire while they were absorbed by the Chinese.

Religious Policies

Both empires incubated foreign religions, especially in times of imperial disorder, but in Rome, Christianity

did not save the empire, and by challenging the significance of earthly power it may even have contributed to

the empire's weakness. In China, Buddhism was absorbed into Confucianism and Daoism and helped to

sustain the national culture in times of political trouble.

The Role of the Emperor

Both empires ascribed divine attributes to the emperor, and both frequently had difficulty in establishing

rules for imperial succession. The Romans often attempted to choose their best general, while the Chinese

selected a man who could control the imperial family and court. Neither empire believed that a single

imperial family should rule forever.

Gender Relationships

Both empires subordinated women to men at all stages of life, and both drew analogies between hierarchies

and loyalties in a well-run family and those in a well-run empire. Both empires used marriages as means of

confirming political alliances with foreign powers. Both periodically felt that excessive concern with sexual

relationships was distracting energy away from the demands of sustaining the empire and instituted strict

codes of sexual morality. In China, far more than in Rome, women of the imperial family played an important

role in politics behind the scenes, particularly in terms of determining succession. One woman, the Empress

Wu (r. 690-705), took the throne herself.

The Significance of Imperial Armies

In both empires, the army was crucial in creating and sustaining the political structure in the face of domestic

and foreign enemies. The Roman Empire as established and ruled by generals, as were the Qin, Han, Sui, and

Tang dynasties in China the empires were periodically threatened and usurped by rebel generals asserting

their own authority. The cost of the armies, especially on distant, unprofitable expeditions, often bankrupted

the government and encouraged its subjects to evade taxes and military service and even to rise in revolt.

The Deployment of Armies of Colonization

Both empires used colonies of soldier-colonizers to garrison and develop remote areas while simultaneously

providing compensation and retirement benefits for the troops.

please mark as brainliest

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers