<u>Answer</u>
c. buying it at a 10 percent discount without sales tax.
<u>Explanation</u>
We are going to compare the 3 choices and then determine the most cost effective.
<em>a. using a paid membership card to buy it at a 10 percent discount.</em>
10% of $100 = 10/100×100 = $10
cost = $100 - $10 = $90
On top of this $90 there is the charges of the membership card.
<em> b. buying it online at a 10 percent discount with a $5 shipping charge.</em>
100%-10% = 90%
90% of 100 = $90
Cost: $90 + $5 = $95
<em>c. buying it at a 10 percent discount without sales tax.</em>
100% - 10% = 90%
90/100 × 100 = $90. This is the must cost effective method since there is no other cost involved.
Answer:(
7
,
6
)
Explanation:
We can find the coordinates of the midpoint of a line segment, by finding the mean of the sum of the
x
coordinates and the mean of the sum of the
y
coordinates.
x
=
8
+
6
2
=
7
y
=
2
+
10
2
=
6
Coordinate of midpoint:
(
7
,
6
)
You are given the X value, replace x with 2 in the first equation to solve for y:
y=2x +3
y = 2(2) +3
y = 4+3
y = 7
Now replace y with 7 and x iwth 2 in the second equation and solve for k:
y = -x +k
7 = -2 +k
Add 2 to both sides:
9 = k
so k = 9
The point is given as k-2, which is 9-2 = 7, which is what y equals in the first equation.
K = 9
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is:

The alternate hypotesis is:

The test statistic is:

In which X is the sample mean,
is the value tested at the null hypothesis,
is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
A researcher used the technique with 260 students and observed that they had a mean of 94 hours. Assume the standard deviation is known to be 6.
This means, respectively, that 
The test-statistic is:



The pvalue is:
2(P(Z < -2.69))
P(Z < -2.69) is the pvalue of Z when X = -2.69, which looking at the z-table, is 0.0036
2*(0.0036) = 0.0072
0.0072 < 0.01, which means that the null hypothesis is accepted, that is, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Five and six thousandths, two hundreths, thirty nine tenths