“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
The confederate states won
Answer:
The correct answer is a collateralized loan.
Explanation:
A collateral is a type of property or other assets that a lender accepts from the borrower for the purpose of security against a loan. The lender can seize the collateral if the loan is not paid back. The value of collateral must be either equal to more than the loan amount.
The example given here is an example of a collateralized loan where a real estate property is used as security.
Other examples of collateral are cars, bank saving deposits, investment accounts.
Answer:
kinesthetic learner
Explanation:
Kinesthetic learner is someone that learns better by engaging in physical or practical activities as against just attending classes and listening to lecturers or watching the activity ben carried out. For a kinesthetic learner to acquire real knowledge and learn, it requires that their whole body engages in movement so as to process new and difficult concept. this was quoted by Favre in 2009.
Kinesthetic learner are good in activities such as swimming, running, dancing, etc. They have great sense of body timing, as well as great sense of their body in space. They are well coordinated, they coordinate their hand - eye excellently well and are quick to reactions.
