his barometric self-esteem.
This type of self- esteem instability reflects the short-term fluctuations in a contextually based global self-esteem. This means that someone with unstable self-esteem will value it positively in one day, but negatively for the other, this can even vary with each situation. An important characteristic of individuals with unstable self-esteem is how they can react very strongly in the experiences that they consider relevant to their self-esteem, within this they can not even see relevance for their self-esteem when there is not. Unstable self-esteem can take many forms. Some people may experience dramatic changes from very positively to feel very negatively about themselves, others may fluctuate mainly in the degree to which they feel positively or negatively about themselves.
Answer:
The correct answer is : Sergio is not liable for Sarah's injuries
Explanation:
In this situation in regards to liability, Sergio is probably not liable for Sarah's injuries because he was assuring the contract to be done. Remember that a contract is an agreement between different parties and the responsibilities were set. In this case, Sergio is not responsible for the incident and they didn't agree on injuries, just in mowing.
Answer: The answer is Headset
Explanation: Headsets allow people to listen to music, videos, movies and any other kind of activity that provides sound without being a disturbance for other people. Generally, in quiet public settings such as libraries, certain workplaces, and internet cafes, the use of headsets is more than mandatory.
Answer:
1) This situation is out of the standard set by Tarasoff decision’s duty to protect because the situation is severe and Dr. Yeung should not rely on probability. This could be possible that Aiden was trying to threaten Dr. Yeung and demanding no interference in his personal life. Dr. Yeung is a health psychologist but as a psychologist, she could understand the seriousness of the situation so she must call the professional support. Dr. Yeung should refer this case to the clinical psychologist and provide support to them about the health and behavior conditions.
2) Ethically, Dr. Yeung’s decision may affect the research purpose but morally her decision may help a person who needs it. The decision of Dr. Yeung was exceptional so it must be considered as an exceptional condition.
3) Dr. Yeung should consult the clinical psychologist and psychiatrists before handling this type of case. Dr. Yeung was not assigned to handle abnormal behavior problems and therapies, she could have handled the situation as an exceptional condition and with the help of team support.
4) Dr. Yeung should consider this case as health and abnormal behavior problem rather than a general condition. The behavior of Aiden was destructive and it should be analyzed with the help of security agencies, medical practitioner, psychologist and psychiatric. Dr. Yeung tried to done her job well but her lack of experience could have threaten her and patient’s life. I think, Dr. Yeung should demand professional help and experienced services.
The answer is true. explanation: they do this to keep the playing field fair but mainly do it to prevent corruption.
