Answer:
It is a violation of NASD rules against guaranteeing a customer against loss.
Explanation:
In this case the RR is guaranteeing the customer against loss. The customer initially bought the shares for $20 the new price is $10. The RR now coming in to buy the shares above market value is a way to guarantee the customer against loss, and its a NASD violation.
Company A uses the FIFO method to account for inventory and Company B uses the LIFO method. The two companies are exactly alike except for the difference in inventory cost flow assumptions. The debt-to-equity ratio measures your company's total debt relative to the amount originally invested by the owners and the earnings that have been retained over time.
The debt to equity ratio using the book value of equity in 2019 would be 2.29.
Finding the debt-to-equity ratio.
This can be found by the formula:
= Interest bearing Debt / Book value of equity
= (Notes payable + Current maturities of long term debt + Long term debt) / Book value of equity
= (10.5 + 39.9 + 239.7) / 126.6
= 2.29
Learn more about debt-to-equity here
brainly.com/question/21408403
#SPj4
Answer:
$418,550
Explanation:
Steps are shown below:
a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
=
=
= 2,040 units
b. The number of orders would be equal to
= Annual demand ÷ economic order quantity
= $52,000 ÷ 2,040 units
= 25.49 orders
c. The average inventory would equal to
= Economic order quantity ÷ 2
= 2040 units ÷ 2
= 1,020 units
d. The total cost of ordering cost and carrying cost equals to
Ordering cost = Number of orders × ordering cost per order
= 25.49 orders × $50
= $1,275
Carrying cost = average inventory × carrying cost per unit
= 1,020 units × $1.25
= $1,275
So, the total annual cost would be
= Purchase cost + ordering cost + carrying cost
= $416,000 + $1,275 + $1,275
= $418,550
Purchase cost = Annual demand × cost per unit
= 52,000 × $8
= $416,000