Answer:
The difficulty faced by Miller while writing 'The Crucible' was that he lacked the quality to describe mildly the environment of witchcraft trial and relate it to the Communist trials.
Explanation:
'Why I Wrote The Crucible: An Artist's Answer to Politics' is an essay written by Arthur Miller. The essay was written with a purpose to bring to notice the reason why Miller penned down play 'The Crucible' in the face of Communists trials.
In paragraph 11, Miller states that during the time of Communist trials, many writers were becoming so imaginable like McCarthy and Miller that they presented the situation through their writings and plays.
<u>When Miller states, that for him writing about witchcraft trials at the time of Communists trials was an act that lacks the tool. Miller states that he lacked the tool of presenting and relating both the trials mildly so that he may not present himself as a Communist party or non-Communist party.</u>
I believe "You will eat lunch / at school / with friends" most clearly develops an argumentative tone because of the 'will'. Sounds like someone's trying to force the person to do that and the person may try to argue back because the will makes it sound like they have no choice in the matter.
Answer:
D. A false creation/ Proceeding from the heat-oppressed brain.
This answer suggests that it could have been an illusion by saying it might have been a "false creation" and that it could have came from his "heat-oppressed brain."
Explanation:
Please mark brainliest and have a great day!
In the story above, Doyle indicates that Greeks took their cultural performances and arts seriously and were good judges of art. The lines from "The Contest" supports the claim is in choice B. It states that "Every Greek was a trained critic, and as unsparing in his hisses as he was lavish in his applause."
"But now, as the man stopped and wiped the abundant sweat from his fat face, the whole assembly burst into a delirium of appreciation."
