"The prince" was the first book that didn't take politics as something ethical or philosophical. Machiavelli wrote it to Lorenzo di Medici as a "guide" to maintain his power. Ancient philosophers were focused on constucting the ideal state. That means, they mentioned the characteristics of a succesfull monarchy for example, but did not considered the things as they were at that moment. Readers find disturbing the tactics that Machiavelli describes to gain or maintain power as they include making people fear you or destroying your enemies. This book is always resumed with the phrase "The end justifies the means", making it clear that the rulers can do anything to maintain their power.
The controversy is understandable, this books shows how cruel can reality be and how politics scrifice ethics in the name of power. The discussion is still relevant nowadays. How far can politicians go to win an election?
Tom joad grapes-he is 66 years old.
Answer:
um what lollllllllllllllll
B, the whole point of a test, exam or assessment is to see how much you know; it is never about judgement. Just because someone doesn't pass a test, it doesn't mean they are dumb.
The answer to the question above is "point you toward the proper method to use" which is the primary purpose of doing the literature review in a research. The literature review part is written before the research method part. The literature review part gives the basis for designing the research method to prove the hypotheses.
