Answer:
The company records the investment by the entry:
(D) debit Cash and credit Owner's Equity
Explanation:
Mr. Decker invested $20,000 in cash in his new business. He is the Owner of the company.
In the case, the company that he invested received cash from Mr. Decker.
The company will record the increasing in cash and increasing in Owner's Equity account by the journal entry:
Debit Cash $20,000
Credit Owner's Equity $20,000
This statement June advances an inductive argument is know to be true from what is presented above
Explanation:
A strong argument is an inductive reasoning that is meant to be strong enough to make it impossible for the conclusion to have been false whether the premises were correct.
Therefore, success or effectiveness of an inductive argument is, unlike deductive argument, a matter of perspective.
Inductive arguments should take vast forms. Some people have the form of making claims on a population or only based on information from either a sample, a subset. Some mediated arguments draw conclusions through an appeal, authority or causal relationship.
Answer:
b. countries can become better off by specializing in what they do best.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage in economics is the ability of an individual or country to produce a specific good or service at a lower opportunity cost better than another individual or country.
The comparative advantage gives a country a stronger sales margin than their competitors as they are able to sell their specific products or render their peculiar services at a lower opportunity cost.
In 1817, David Ricardo who is an english political economist talked about the law of comparative advantage in his book “On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation."
Also, the principle of comparative advantage asserts that countries can become better off by specializing in what they do best.
This simply means that, any country applying the principle of comparative advantage, would enjoy an increase in output and consequently, a boost in their Gross Domestic Products (GDP).
Answer:
The employer will be held liable.
Explanation:
If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.
It is called direct liability.
The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.
The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :
- Foreign principal
- Agent signs the contract in his own name
- Non-existent principal
- Principal cannot be sued:
- Undisclosed principal
Example :
A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.
