Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.
Answer:
Instructions are listed below
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Estimates:
Direct labor-hours required to support estimated output 18,000.
Fixed overhead costs $ 198,000.
Variable overhead cost per direct labor-hour $ 1.00
A) overhead rate= (fixed + variable cost)/direct labor hour
Overhead rate= (198000 + 1*18000)/18000= 12
B) Direct materials $ 719
Direct labor cost $ 177
Direct labor-hours used 7
Manufacturing overhead= $1* 7= $7
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Cash $8,730
Sales Discount ($9,000 × 3%) $270
To Accounts receivable $9,000 ($10,000 - $1,000)
Here cash and sales discount is debited as it increased the assets and discount while on the other hand the account receivable should be credited as it reduced the assets
