The difference between the peripheral and central routes to persuasion is that the peripheral route involves less cognitive elaboration than the central route.
Persuasion is a method that is normally used to influence someone. Peripheral is a method that is normally used when people being targeted have no interest or rather have less interest in a topic. Here someone depends on features like moods and other kinds of impressions. Since people have less motivation and the ability to digest a piece of information then they will use mental shortcuts .
A central route is normally a logical approach whereby data and facts are used to convince people. The central route needs the audience to strive to process what is being given to them and decode the message. This persuasion helps an audience to believe what they are being told, because of the techniques used.
The correct choice is c. The peripheral route involves less cognitive elaboration than the central route.
To read more about persuasion methods visit:
brainly.com/question/29438804
#SPJ4
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
Daily hassles are irritant minors that trigger your stress. They happen everyday and can be just frustrating, like being in a slow traffic or forgetting something important at home, or highly sad and stressful, like losing a dear relative. Studies show that people that consider they life highly stressful are three times more likely to die earlier, so stress is not only an pshychological thing, it affects the whole body.
Answer:
The Stamp Act was a direct tax while the sugar act modified a pre-existing duty.
Explanation:
Answer:
Inductive
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning creates wide conclusions from certain observations, just as in this case study, the rate of murder. Majorly, there is data (in our case study- This pattern holds true, even when she controls for population differences (so it is not due to more people living in northern cities)), then generalizations are made from the data (from our case study--greater "culture of violence" in the south produces higher murder rates). This is often referred to as inductive logic, according to Utah State University.
"In inductive inference, there is a shift from an actual one to general form. We make many notations, create a pattern, make a conclusion, and create an explanation or a theory," Wassertheil-Smoller told Live Science. "In science, there is a constant interconnection among inductive inference (based on notations) and deductive inference (based on theory), until we arrive in proximity to the 'truth,' by not just approaching but to be able to prove with total certainty."
Another instance of inductive logic is, "when a person pulls out a coin from a bag and it happened to be a penny. On reaching out the second time, the person also picked a penny, and at the third time, a third coin from the bag is also a penny. It will bring the person to make a generalization that all the coins in the bag are pennies."
Even if the entire premises are correct in a statement, inductive reasoning permits for the generalization to be false. Another example "Semai is a grandmother. Semai is bald. Therefore, all grandmothers are bald." The generalization does not comply logically from the statements.
