50 Points! Brainliest + 5 Stars! PLEASE HELP!

Social Studies

2 answers:

stiks02 [169]3 years ago

5 0

Answer: this is what I found

If I didn’t help you can give me a bad review

Explanation:

During the years immediately following the Civil War, President Andrew Johnson clashed repeatedly with the Republican-controlled Congress over reconstruction of the defeated South. Johnson vetoed legislation that Congress passed to protect the rights of those who had been freed from slavery. This clash culminated in the House of Representatives voting, on February 24, 1868, to impeach the president. On March 5, the trial began in the Senate, where Republicans held more seats than the two-thirds majority required to remove Johnson from office. When the trial concluded on May 16, however, the president had won acquittal, not because a majority of senators supported his policies but because a sufficient minority wished to protect the office of the president and preserve the constitutional balance of powers.

const2013 [10]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

YES BECAUSE HE VIOLATED AN ACT

The primary charge against Johnson was that he had violated the Tenure of Office Act, passed by Congress in March 1867 over Johnson's veto.

...

You might be interested in

Giorgio memorizes the german poem "the erlking" to recite in his eighth grade german class. he remembers it well for weeks after

krek1111 [17]

The correct answer we are looking for is the transience.

One of the seven sins of memory. The ability of Giorgio to recite a poem fades because of the so called transience.

This is known as the transitory nature. Transience means passing with time or is the state of being brief and short-lived.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which term is synonymous with “natural rights,” according to Enlightenment philosophers?

ycow [4]

The term is Universal rights

6 0

3 years ago

Please Answer As Soon As Possible

nika2105 [10]

In a series of critical decisions, the Supreme Court greatly expanded its authority. Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the Supreme Court as the final arbiter of the Constitution and its power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. ... Peck (1810) declared the Court's power to void state laws.

I hope that helps :)

8 0

3 years ago

Rhonda is not hired for her dream position and believes that she is the victim of gender discrimination. she is angry and wants

tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Base on the given scenario, Rhonda should file a complaint to the EEOC and not just in any court that she pleases. EEOC or also known as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the one responsible of administering laws with the citizens in terms of discrimination that they may experience in the workplace of which Rhonda felt and experienced.

8 0

3 years ago

According to Kant, it is morally permissible to treat a server in a restaurant as a means to the end of buying food. Select one:

lana [24]

According to Kant, if we treat a cashier as a means to the end of buying food, an action that is permissible is achieved. Therefore, it is true.

<h3>Who is a cashier?</h3>

It should be noted that a cashier facilitates money transactions for customers through accepting cash, cheques, credit, or debit.

According to Kant, it is morally permissible to treat a server in a restaurant as a means to the end of buying food. According to Kant, sometimes we use people to achieve some end.

Learn more about cashier on:

brainly.com/question/18637447

3 0

2 years ago