Choice B is far too off of Martin Luther King Jr's objective, so are the rest of the answer choices below that answer. Option B expresses that the speech was to encourage violent protests which is opposite of what Martin Luther King Jr and many other people wanted to this day. They wanted to peacefully protest and in the recent news you can see people are peacefully protesting to this day. The objective of the speech was to fight for freedom and encourage others to stand up for a change, which answer choice C says the complete opposite. Martin Luther King *Wanted* a change in society so he fought for it. The last choice barely makes any sense to me, commonly, it does not cost a banks worth of money to educate people of basic human rights.
