<span>Tatiana's sister and brother-in-law visit "Paul" at the milles collines. because of the danger, they want to leave "Rwanda" and take "Tatiana" and the children with them. they feel paul is in no danger because he is a "Hutu", while they, tatiana, and the children are "Tutsi". paul says there is no danger as the "United Nations" and the "world press" are watching. later, paul is driving home and hears gunfire, shouting and glass breaking. buildings are burning. when he arrives, his family and "neighbors" are hiding in the dark. there are no "lights" on. they say there is a "rumor" that "President Habyarimana" has been "murdered", and "Tutsi rebels" have killed him. paul says this is "nonsense".</span>
Answer:
A common form of fossilization is permineralization. This occurs when the pores of plant materials, bones, and shells are impregnated by mineral matter from the ground, lakes, or oceans. ... Sometimes the mineral substance of the fossils will completely dissolve and other minerals replace them.
Roman roads were a vital part of the development of the Roman state, from about 500 BC through the expansion during the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire. Roman roads enabled the Romans to move armies and trade goods and to communicate. The Romans became adept at constructing roads, which they called viae. Therefore advancing Rome greatly.
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois were two important leaders of the Black community in the United States. However, they each had very different opinions about the role of the African community, and on how equality could be achieved.
Booker T. Washington believed that the Black community needed to adopt a philosophy of self-help, racial solidarity and accomodation. He believed that African Americans had the duty to educate themselves and improve their livelihood in order to be taken seriously by white Americans. On the other hand, W.E.B. DuBois believed that this approach only put an extra burden on black people, while ignoring the responsibilities of whites. He argued that social change had to come through political change, and advocated political action.
I believe that their differences were as substantial as the friction between their followers. The two men had very different opinions about race and advancement. Moreover, I believe that the opinions of Booker T. Washington were more suited to the temper of the times as he took a more positive view of white people and a more negative view of conflict and political activism.
Answer:
Better access to natural resources like coal and iron
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
