Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Explanation:
Social study may be reffered to as a broad field which accesses and studied man's society, this means that it extensively covers aspects that has to do with man's indigenous and cultural life which is about the tribes and inclination of the different tribal groups. It also covers areas of geography which is about the physical environment, impacts of climate, weather, vegetation and so on. In addition, The historical background or origin is also covered in social study. Governance, politics which also has to do with our society and wellbeing is also an important aspect of social study. It introduces the different types of government. The roles of leaders and responsibility of followers and muvb more. These are only some core areas of social study which covers more Than 5 distinct fields.
Answer:
Manolo: Hello ... Irene, isn't it?
Irene: Yes. I'm Irene, okay?
MAnolo: Alright. I'm Manolo.
Irene: I hope I wasn't late.
Manolo: What time is it?
Irene: 2 pm.
Manolo: You arrived just in time.
Irene: What course do you take?
Manolo: I study history and philosophy and you?
Irene: English literature.
Manolo: Can we start the research?
Irene: Yes, we can. I believe that we can find suitable books in the third hall. Should we go?
Manolo: Sure.
Explanation:
The dialogue was made with basic questions between two people who were meeting and needed to do academic work together. As they were in a library, I believe that the execution of some academic research between the two is the most appropriate subject to establish this dialogue.
The piedmont region of North Carolina is known for having soil that is good for making bricks
Answer:
The correct answer is - <em>3000-2000 BC</em>.
Explanation:
The fundamental pattern of <u>Ancient Egyptian governance was set in Egypt between 3150 - 2890 BC</u> with the First Dynasty of Egypt. It resembled a theocratic monarchy where the king ruled and acted as a middle-man between his loyals and gods. The king was supported by vizier and other governmental officials. Kingdom was divided into districts (nomes) and was administered by nomarchs (regional governors) who oversaw all operations in nomes.
Although Egypt fits into this time-span, <em>Sumerians </em>are credited for the invention of government around 3500BC. Sumerians form of government was a mix of democracy and monarchy, where each city-state was ruled by king for the gods.
