Answer:
Jim Crow laws in the south limited the impact of the fifteenth amendment by segregating people of color from others. "separate but equal" doesn't always mean the same. The fifteenth amendment states that the federal government can't discriminate people of color against caucasians. Which is exactly what Jim crow laws are doing. Therefore, Jim Crow laws limit the freedoms stated in the fifteenth amendment.
Explanation:
hope this helps!
Answer:A -the tale of Genji
Explanation:
The Tale of Genji is a masterpiece literature by Murasaki Shikibu
Hope this helps :)
Women can pay more attention to the tone and emotion of statements than men because they listen with both hemispheres of the brain.
<h3 /><h3>What are the cerebral hemispheres?</h3>
They correspond to the regions of the brain divided into left and right cerebral hemispheres, where different functions are defined for each side, the right cerebral hemisphere being responsible for reasoning through language and the left for emotions through visual resources.
Therefore, the connection of the cerebral hemispheres is different between men and women, which generates different characteristics between genders.
Find out more about cerebral hemispheres here:
brainly.com/question/25760859
#SPJ1
<span>Free Enterprise System is another name for market economy, also known as capitalism, where people are free to become entrepreneurs and own and operate an enterprise (business).</span>
With the first one,you're going to want to use Ethos,or the appeal to emotions,for this to work. I would say this: There is an extent to which someone can be punished. If somebody committed murder,the death penalty,or more politely called "Capital Punishment",would honestly have no effect on them. It does not truly give them a chance to dwell on their actions and how they messed up someone's life. Not only that,but you also become a murderer if an innocent man is found guilty of a murder he didn't commit,which makes you no better than a murderer. Worse in fact because at least the person who actually did kill someone did it them selves and not with an executioner. I don't support Capital punishment because that puts someone else's blood on my hands.
As for the second one...I'd say this: By nature,humans are social creatures. We desire human contact and interaction. In fact,we NEED it in order to function normally. Capital Punishment only supports the tradition of "An Eye For An Eye And A Tooth For A Tooth." If you really want to punish someone,don't kill them physically,but instead mentally and socially. If you take away someone's ability to interact with people,it causes them to think back on their mistakes and it leaves them with no other choice but to confront their bad choices. Capital Punishment gets it over with quickly with no time to repent or ask for forgiveness,but life in prison with no chance of parole unless proven mentally capable by a team of psychologists,is by far the worst punishment you could ever give someone.
