All categories

4 years ago

When economists adopt a market-oriented strategy to deal with pollution?

Business

1 answer:

blsea [12.9K]4 years ago

6 0

Answer: They raise the cost of pollution to discourage it.

Explanation:

Under the market oriented approach the forces of demand and supply determine the optimum quantity of a good and the price at which the good must be traded. The price gives us information on the relative scarcity of the good. When pollution is free, businesses will produce a large amount of it. However, when market oriented approach is used, the demand for pollution coming from the society as a whole interacts with the supply of pollution created by the various business and consumption activities. The intersection of this determines the price for pollution and the optimum quantity of pollution. Thus, pollution is not free anymore, it has a cost which is the price of pollution. Thus, the market oriented approach increases the cost of pollution to reduce the level of pollution.

You might be interested in

g Other things the same, if the exchange rate changes from 6 Chinese yuan per dollar to 7 Chinese yuan per dollar, then the doll

MrMuchimi

Answer:

appreciates and buys more Chinese goods

Explanation:

Nominal exchange rate is the rate at which one unit of currency can be exchanged for another unit of currency.

If exchange rate is 1 dollar for 6 Chinese yuan , it means that 1 dollar would buy 6 Chinese yuan.

If exchange rate now becomes 1 dollar for 7 Chinese yuan , it means that 1 dollar would buy 7 Chinese yuan.

One dollar is now buying more Chinese yaun (7>6). It means that the dollar has appreciated and the Yaun has depreciated.

Currency appreciation is when the a currency increases in value.

As a result the dollar would buy more Chinese goods.

I hope my answer helps you

5 0

3 years ago

291. Much of the hope for continued improvement of the economy lies in the projection of increasing consumer spending this year.

sergij07 [2.7K]

Answer:

The correct answer is E:

Much of the hope for continued improvement of the economy lies in the increase in consumer spending that is projected for.

Explanation:

i. Much of the hope (this is the main Subject of the conversation)

ii. for continued improvement (this is the Prepositional phrase. It modifies the noun “hope”)

iii. of the economy (this is a Prepositional phrase – it modifies the noun “improvement”)

iv. lies in the projection (This is the main Verb – “lies”)

v. of increasing consumer spending this year. (This is the prepositional phrase. It modifies the noun “projection”)

At first glance, it would appear that the positive experience that is anticipated is the projection.

<em>A projection (unqualified) in this case is an estimate of how a thing will be in the future.</em>

Having stated this, we see that it is more logical to hope for a positive experience that will occur than to just hope. Hence the hope is really in the increase in consumer spending not in the projection as a separate word.

(E) therefore is the Correct option because in this option that in this option “that” modifies “increase”.

Cheers

8 0

3 years ago

In contrast to less cohesive groups, members of highly cohesive group members display all of the following EXCEPT:

Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

The correct answer is b) tending to leave work early when possible.

Explanation:

Highly cohesive groups have more discussions and bring out more information, but it cannot be said that these groups convince dissent. Highly cohesive groups tend to have less absenteeism and rotation.

Some advantages and limitations of highly cohesive groups are as follows:

- Social position of the group: greater loyalty with the group of high social position.

- Size: the smaller the group, the closer the relationship between the group members.

- Communications: more easily to communicate, greater cohesion of the group.

- Isolation of other groups: physical isolation tends to improve cohesion.

- Management practices: the manager can encourage competition or comparison between employees to make intimate relationships between workers impossible.

- External pressures: the members of a group join more intimately when they are threatened by a common danger; They forget their differences and close ranks to oppose a new supervisor.

- Success: a group will be stronger and more cohesive if in the past their cooperative action has been successful.

3 0

3 years ago

Nick and Matt are the partners in a local health food store. They

Grace [21]

a. The amount that each invested is: Nick $21,900; Matt $51,100.

b. Percent of the business owned by Matt is 70%.

a. Amount invested by each

First step is to calculate the total parts

Total parts=3x + 7x

Total parts=10x

Second step is to calculate the cost per part(x)

Cost per part(x)=73,000/10

Cost per part(x)=7,300

Third step is to calculate the money invested by Nick and Matt

Money invested by Nick=3x

Money invested by Nick=3×7,300

Money invested by Nick=$21,900

Money invested by Matt=7x

Money invested by Matt=7×7,300

Money invested by Matt=$51,100

b. Percent owned by Matt

Using this formula

Percent owned by Matt =Part owned by matt/Total part

Let plug in the formula

Percent owned by Matt =7x/(3x+7x)

Percent owned by Matt=7x/10x

Percent owned by Matt=0.7×100

Percent owned by Matt =70%

Inconclusion the amount that each invested is Nick $21,900; Matt $51,100 and the percent of the business owned by Matt is 70%.

Learn more here:

brainly.com/question/17250642

8 0

3 years ago

Sheffield Corp. uses the composite method and its composite rate is 7.5% per year, what entry should it make when plant assets t

muminat

Answer:

$ 142 375

Explanation:

Thinking process:

Let the composite rate be given by the formula:

$A = P (1+\frac{r}{n})^{nt}$

where

A = amount after interest

$\frac{r}{n}$ = interest rate

t = time

n = number of times (per year)

Therefore, this gives:

$A =134 000 (1+\frac{0.75}{12})^{1}\\ = $ 142 375$

8 0

3 years ago