Progressives wanted to take an activist role in society because they opposed the laissez-faire approach of the Gilded Age. Progressives believed human beings and governments could harness the power of science to improve the human condition. This led to policies informed by governmental regulation, scientific innovation and human oriented policies designed to improve the human condition.
Answer:
A major difference between the two is that Herbert Hoover was much less interventionist than Roosevelt, intervenionist meaning a person who believes the state should intervene the economy in order to fix it, instead of leaving all economic solutions to the market alone.
Hervert Hoover only reluctantly applied some interventionist policies to try to end the Great Depression: for example, signing the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1929 which allowed the reduction of crop surpluses that were a cause of farmer's economic ruin. But beyond a few other measures, there's not much else to his presidency. He did not even end Prohibiton for example.
FDR on the other hand, gave a lot more power to the state. He implemented a series of reforms known as the New Deal, with the aim of ending the Great Depression. He also ended Prohibition, and led the country during World War II.
In general terms, most historians coincide that Roosevelt was a much better president than Herbert Hoover.
Answer:
One way in which King Louis XVI of France and Czar Nicholas II of Russia are similar is that both. (1) were executed by revolutionaries. (2) were known as great military leaders. (3) advocated religious reform.J
Explanation:
This is how they are similar.
<u>The following statements are true regarding urban American Indian populations:
</u>
- Generally bond together to form a multi-tribal group
- Look for opportunities to help American Indian people participate in local economy
- Are more likely to gain access to local, state, and federal programs.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Urban American Indian population is increasing and rooted there from more than last 500 years. They face many challenges regarding livelihood, healthcare and education and also for being the citizen of the nation. The term "tribe" nowadays is often associated with American Indians. This not means that urban Indians are tribes, but they create communities to help them maintain their native customs and cultures.
The pan-Indian nature of urban Indian communities strongly supports the vitality of the Indian tribe and the desire of people of India to ensure the preservation of their cultures. Also, urban Indians take part in local economy by making opportunities to explore their cultures.
Poverty and unemployment were giant issues, security for community are such matters which act as driving force that they are more likely to gain access to local, state and federal programs with the help of various policies, schemes, program to acquire command on qualitatively lifestyle.