Answer:
Individual Privacy vs. National Security The need to protect National Security is far more important than individual privacy. The country is the freedom that we have. That freedom and the right to live freely is protected by various government agencies. From time to time, the privacy a person has may have to be invaded to guarantee the security of the country and other citizens.
Answer:
What might be unfair is if the person is trying to say there side but the cop is not listening to the persons reason for why they did it
Explanation:
for my explanation is to just worry about you and if the cops try to say any smart comment don't say anything because all ur gonna do is put yourself in a big hole of trouble
This Act, by prohibiting private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, by preventing excessive concentration of economic power and by eliminating unreasonable restraint on production, sale, price, technology and the like, and all other unjust restriction of business. The economic role of competition is to discipline the various participants in economic life to provide their goods and services skillfully and cheaply.
Answer:
D. a loose interpretation of the Constitution could be used to increase federal power.
Explanation:
John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1801 till his death in 1835. Without any prior study in law, he studied law in only just six weeks.
Under Supreme Court's decision under Chief Justice John Marshall upheld Alexander Hamilton's interpretation of the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton advocated broad and liberal interpretation of the Constitution. This belief was upheld by the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall. The Supreme Court uphelded a loose and liberal interpretation of the Constitution could be used to increase federal power.
Therefore, option D is correct.
