Answer:
what is the three questions?
Explanation:
.
Answer:
I think you meant to ask:Read the excerpt from The Story of My Life by Helen Keller.
Dr. Bell advised my father to write to Mr. Anagnos, director of the Perkins Institution in Boston, the scene of Dr. Howe's great labours for the blind, and ask him if he had a teacher competent to begin my education. This my father did at once, and in a few weeks there came a kind letter from Mr. Anagnos with the comforting assurance that a teacher had been found. This was in the summer of 1886. But Miss Sullivan did not arrive until the following March.
Which line from the excerpt shows the first-person point of view?
(A)Dr. Bell advised my father to write to Mr. Anagnos
(B)in a few weeks there came a kind letter from Mr. Anagnos
(C)This was in the summer of 1886.
(D)But Miss Sullivan did not arrive until the following March.
Explanation:
If you did want to ask that here is the answer because I had the same quizz before:
Answer is A
because...
Keller’s father contacted the director of the Perkins Institution and requested a teacher for his daughter. After a long wait, Miss Sullivan arrived at the Kellers’ house in March 1887.In Helen Keller's "The Story of My Life", she narrates how she began to learn and live her life as a blind and deaf person since her childhood. She recounts how she came to be after her lessons with Miss Annie Sullivan.At the end of Chapter III, Helen mentions how Dr. Alexander Graham Bell who they had consulted about her condition had suggested her father Mr. Keller to write to Mr. Anagnos. Being the director of Perkins Institution in Boston, he would be able to suggest any teacher to help Helen.
Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
It allows you to focus on a single thought or idea which naturally prevents distraction from other random ideas,thoughts or emotions