1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Flura [38]
3 years ago
15

PLEASE HURRYYYYY!!!!!! THIS ASSIGNMENT IS DUE IN THE NEXT HOUR!!!!! What are the positive results of government regulation of th

e economy? What are the negative results? How would the answers change based on the point of view of the person answering (e.g. consumer, business owner, etc.)?
History
1 answer:
STALIN [3.7K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Regulation is a major way in which government influences the U.S. market economy. The scope of government regulations is vast and reaches all sectors of the economy and all aspects of our daily lives. United States faces growing challenges in an increasingly competitive global economy. Recent decades have seen a decline in economic growth and innovation, and one important cause is poorly-designed government policies. Large swaths of the American economy are distorted by government mandates and incentives, and the vast majority of binding “laws” are not enacted by our elected representatives in Congress, but are promulgated by agencies as regulations.

You might be interested in
After Pearl Harbor, Japan went on to capture:
guajiro [1.7K]

The correct answer is - D. All of the above.

Japan had a vision of gaining as much territory and resources as possible. They wanted to gain control of big portion of East Asia, Southeast Asia, and Oceania.

After the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, they didn't seemed very concerned about the United States and their actions because of it, sot hey continued to conquer new territory. they managed to get hold on to many islands, big and small, as well as some mainland territories. Some oft he newly conquered places were the Wake Island, Hong Kong, and the Philippines.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the two prevailing views on wht parties formed in the early republic
sdas [7]

The development of the political parties formed in the early republican can be attributed to the rivalry between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton.

Jefferson was a strong anti-federalist and would help to develop the Democratic-Republican party. Jefferson's focus on a small central government, states rights, and developing a nation based on independent farmers was a message that spoke to many rural communities.

On the other hand, there was Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton favored a strong central government, the development of an industrialized economy, and a loose interpretation of the US Constitution. Hamilton was supported by Northern merchants and wealthy elites, especially in the Northeast.

These two vastly different goals for America helped to spark the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties in the United States during the early Republic.

4 0
2 years ago
Adalah dunia Hari ini Aman damai​
serg [7]
Shilof salió casa, I don’t understand thanks
6 0
2 years ago
Use the graph to answer parts A, B, and C of the question that follows.
aalyn [17]

Answer:

A) One effect of the 2008 economic crisis would create an insane decrease in salaries, jobs, and the overall marketplace. This wreck caused a serious dip in the economy during the developed world.

B) Another effect the 2008 economic crash would create was a damaging impact on employment. Thousands of people had lost their Job thus the broken marketplace meant it would be incredibly hard to find new work.

C) One response to Globalisms terrible grip on the economy was help from neighboring countries. Everyone was experiencing loss, countries couldn't support themselves with their weak economies so to try and combat this loss people began to work together and trade certain goods.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Why did charles beard believe that the constitution was written with economic interests in mind?
Talja [164]
<span>Charles Beard believed that the constitution was written by a group of rich people with economic interests. Beard believed that the reasons were financial interest and called the constitution a counterrevolution of the holders of bonds against ordinary people, farmers, and debtors. I argue that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were not the true motivation of the editors and were trying to protect their wealth. The authors were rich and powerful men who did things like allow slavery to continue and the contradiction of their speeches.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Could the Confederacy have maintained slavery even after the civil war was underway?
    9·1 answer
  • Richard Nixon reached out to this country in the early 1970s in an attempt to normalize diplomatic relations.
    10·1 answer
  • The “Pueblo Pope” led the Pueblo<br> people against the Spanish in what is today
    9·1 answer
  • The Innovative Architecture Of Medieval Europe Is Bet Reflected In Which Type Of Structure
    12·1 answer
  • What building did the Romans build that is EXTREMELY SIMILAR to Greek architecture?​
    5·2 answers
  • How the Civil War changed American Literature
    6·1 answer
  • (0.1)^2 =<br> giving brainlest
    15·1 answer
  • What features divided the Nile river valley in two different regions and help isolate the area from the outsiders
    11·1 answer
  • Explain how the Supreme Court has used the Bill of Rights and
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is terminating decimal.<br>1/6<br>1/3<br>1/5<br>1/7​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!