The Neolithic Revolution also known as Neolithic Demographic Transition, some of the time called the Agricultural Revolution, was the wide-scale move of numerous human societies from a way of life of chasing and assembling to one of agribusiness and settlement, making conceivable an undeniably bigger populace.
Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force.
That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.
The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference.
That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further.
Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
Answer:
the rise of Napoleon
a strong leadership of Louis XVI
the First and Second Estates were very angry because of the high taxes they had to pay
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Alexander the Great
In 336 B.C., Alexander the Great became the leader of the Greek kingdom of Macedonia. By the time he died 13 years later, Alexander had built an empire that stretched from Greece all the way to India.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It is that people like Samuel Slater were considered traitors in England because they were believed to have stolen trade secrets. I think the appeal of bringing the Industrial Revolution to the US was worth the risk for some because that meant the great opportunity to make a lot of money in America.
Historians have documented cases in that spies stole secrets from British Industries and other European industries. These European companies developed some innovations that ended up being installed in the formation of Industries in the United States.
And although it was a very risky enterprise. It was the chance to develop the American industry that produced millions of dollars for owners and investors.
There were some cases in which British sailors intercepted ships headed to America that were carrying documents or parts of machines that had been stolen from British industries.
The Industrial Revolution in the United States changed the life of many people and also changed the way goods were produced through mass production and the use of machines.
