The answer is "seventy percent".
Sexual harassment becomes chargeable and it is reported that more than half of the female officers are in one way or other are harassed by their male counterparts.
The answer is D) religious issues.
Hope this is helpful
1) - removing barriers to trade does not protect from foreign influence - false.
2) regional trade blocks are usually correlated with decreasing, not increasing tariffs - false.
3) this it true - and this is the reason - correct answer
4) it increased, not reduces diffusion- not the correct answer
Responses may vary but should include some or all of the following information:
The United Kingdom, Germany, and Russia all have mixed economies. The United Kingdom and Germany share the most in common. They both have highly developed economies with few government restrictions and are focused on the service industry. The main difference between the two economies is that Germany is also focused on manufacturing, which makes it one of the most powerful economies in the world. Russia’s economy is somewhat different than the other two. Though it is a mixed economy, one of its greatest challenges is changing from a command economy to a market economy. The government has more control of Russia’s economy than the other two countries’ governments do of theirs. It is still a developing economy that is shifting form agriculture to manufacturing, energy, and service. Though Russia’s economy is growing quickly, it faces issues of corruption in the private sector and in government. This works for Edge nuity.
Well, this question cannot really be answered generally. It's a matter of judgement, and it's best judged for particular cases. The consideration of this depends on two factors:
what are the probable costs (in terms of human life, and the quality of human life) of the invasion? - it's important not to diminish these factors, as the assessments of casualties often tend to be lower than the actual numbers
how high is the risk of the alternative. Do we have a good, unbiased reason to believe that a spread of nuclear weapons (unchecked spread, or spread that gives reasons to worry. US has a lot of nuclear weapons, but since it's not planning to use them on other country, it wouldn't be justified to attach the US) will happen? what kind of conflict are we risking?
in any case, this is not an easy question, and perhaps there will never be a good answer for it.
