Hey. Let me help you on this question.
Sharing an apartment is a common practice all around the world. For example, for this question, I will use the example of communal apartments that were built and used in Soviet Union as the solution towards a lack of housing in urban areas.
There are many advantages, and disadvantages to this type of leaving just like you mentioned. It's important to know that every apartment is different, and different types of apartments have different pros and cons to them. For example, sharing a simple one family oriented apartment between two families will result in an extreme lack of space; however, since we are using specially oriented communal apartments as an example, we are skipping this one.
Lack of personal space is one of the disadvantages, and most shared apartments have different bathrooms to solve this problem. One of few other problems included is the fact that one family is dependent on another. For example, if somebody's baby wakes up in the middle of the night and starts screaming, there is a great chance other family will wake up from the noise; however, most shared apartments are structured specifically to eliminate most of the noise.
Some of the advantages might be a much lower rental cost, greater ties with people you are sharing an apartment with, and simple mutual aid that can be given. I bet it's very fun for children to have a best friend right next their door!
Answer:
In the discussion of Julius Caesar, one controversial issue is how did he die. On the one hand, he is more of a victim than villain. On the other hand, he can be a villain more than a victim. Everyone has a different perspective for if he is a victim or villain. In the following paragraphs, there will be a comparison on Mark Antony’s Funeral Speech and Brutus’s Funeral Speech on whether Julius Caesar is a victim or villain.
First, Julius Caesar demonstrates in his characteristic that shows that he is a dictator. In Brutus’s Funeral Speech it says, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” (3.2.23-25). In this quote that Brutus said shows that if Caesar were to have ruled he would not be a great ruler and would of took the people’s rights away. Another characteristic that Brutus shows about Julius Caesar in his quote is, “…as he was valiant, I honour him: but—as he was ambitious, I slew him” (3.2.26-28). In this quote that Brutus said shows that Caesar was ambitious which means that he was eager to rule.
Second, in Mark Antony’s speech, it shows Caesar being more of a victim than a villain. For example, “The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so, it was a grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answered it" (3.2.79-82). In this quote that Antony said shows that it…show more content…
Brutus believed that Caesar was ambitious, when in reality he was well caring and understanding. In Brutus’s speech he mentions that Caesar is ambitious, “…as he was
Explanation:
Answer:
Jungian theory can be applied to literature of any period—there is a brilliant analysis of Colonna’s Hypnerotomachia Poliphili by Linda Fierz-David based on the psychological meaning of alchemical symbolism. Freudian and related theories fail for pre-Romantic work. As for post-colonial theory—only for works written with that point of view. Valid analysis of meaning is possible only in the context of the period and milieu in which a work was written.
Explanation: