Answer:
A medicine or other substance which has a physiological effect when ingested or otherwise introduced into the body.
What led to the creation of the hammurabiss code was the need to put justice in the town and to be fair to everyone
The learning that takes place prior to
joining the organization is the anticipatory stage of organizational
socialization. The anticipatory stage is also known as the phase one of organizational
socialization; phase two is the stage of organizational<span>
Encounter, while phase three is the stage of Metamorphosis.</span>
From 10th to 13th century, Chinese farming in the South China region was increasingly commercialized.
Explanation:
There was a burgeoning increase in trade during that time. This meant that the agriculture of china was at that time
-- commercialized to a great extent making cash crops more than the ones needed for subsistence.
-- using the cash crops and trading with northern china
--use of old tools but with some moderns arrangements like the till.
--use of a manure style that would be copied across the world
--finding of trade networks in collaboration with south east Asia.
-- a network of multi season crops spread across the land.
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
