1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sladkih [1.3K]
3 years ago
7

PLS HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!

Mathematics
2 answers:
Mice21 [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

false

Step-by-step explanation:

habitat is where an animals stays

environment is where a population of animals stay

habitat- small amount of animals

environment- large amount of animals

VMariaS [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

Proof: Habitat is an animals main living area you could say, enviornment is the areas they could choose otherwise known as nature.

You might be interested in
Jenn wants to measure the height of a tree. She walks exactly 125 feet from the base of the
nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

81.2\:\mathrm{ft}

Step-by-step explanation:

We can form a right triangle and use basic trig for a right triangle to solve this problem:

\tan33^{\circ}=\frac{h}{125}, where h is the height of the tree.

Solving, we get:

h=125\cdot \tan 33^{\circ},\\h\approx \fbox{$81.2\:\mathrm{ft}$}.

6 0
3 years ago
Choose the correct translation of the following statement into symbolic form using the uppercase letters available. If neither w
Over [174]

Answer:

¬(W∨S)→¬(J∨E)

D→(B∨C)

X is true

No

Step-by-step explanation:

The hypotheses  "neither water nor soft drinks can quench your thirst" translates to ¬(W∨S) ("neither nor" negates the disjunction W∨S). The "if,... then" translates to the implication symbol (arrow). The conclusion "juice will not do it, unless the juice contains electrolytes" translates to ¬(J∨E). This is because if J or E were true, then J would be true (because E implies J), contrary to the conclusion that J is false ("juice will not do it"), then J∨S is false.

The hypothesis here is "the dyer breaks" hence D is the hypothesis. The conclusion is "we will hang the clothes to dry, or take the clothes to a coin-operated laundry" which is the same as (B∨C).

The proposition p→p is always true (according to truth tables). In this case, p:=X is true, then p is true and X is true.

X∨Y is false if and only if X is false and Y is false, so both statements X,Y must be false.

5 0
3 years ago
In a word processing document or on a separate piece of paper, use the guide to construct a two column proof proving that lines
lisabon 2012 [21]

To enable the completion of the proof that line <em>l</em> is parallel to line <em>m</em>, a

diagram showing the lines and their common transversal is attached.

The completed two column proof is presented as follows;

Statement  {}                                                      Reason

1. ∠1 and ∠2 are supplementary angles  {}   1. Given

2. m∠1 + m∠2 = 180°   {}                                 2. <u>Definition of supplementary ∠s</u>

3. ∠1 and ∠3 are supplementary angles  {}  3. Exterior sides in opposite rays  

4. <u>m∠1 + m∠3 = 180° </u>    {}                                4. <u>Definition of supplementary ∠s</u>

5. m∠1 + m∠2 = m∠1 + m∠3      {}                   5. <u>Transitive property of equality</u>

6. <u>m∠2 = m∠3 </u>     {}                                        6. <u>Subtraction property of equality</u>    

7. l ║ m      {}                                                   7. <u>Converse of alternate interior </u>

    {}                                                                      <u>angles postulate</u>

Reasons:

  • Reason for statement 2: Supplementary angles are defined as two angles that sum up to 180°

  • Reason for statement 3: Two angles are supplementary if the exterior sides that form each angle are opposite rays (rays that are drawn out infinitely in opposite direction but have the same endpoint)

  • Statement 4: Mathematical expression of the sum of ∠1 and ∠3; Reason for statement 4 is the definition of supplementary angles

  • Reason for statement 5: Transitive property of equality describes the property that if a number <em>x</em> = <em>y</em>, and <em>z </em>= <em>y</em>, then <em>x</em> = <em>z</em>.

  • Statement 6: Subtracting m∠1 from both sides of the equation in statement 5. gives; m∠1 + m∠2 - m∠1 = m∠1 + m∠3 - m∠1 ⇒ m∠2 = m∠3. Reason for statement 6 is the subtraction property of equality

  • Reason for statement 7: The converse of the alternate interior angles postulate states that if the alternate interior angles formed between two  lines and a common transversal are congruent, the two lines are parallel.

Learn more here:

brainly.com/question/25178453

6 0
3 years ago
HELP DUE AT MIDNIGHT TN
White raven [17]

Answer:

102

Step-by-step explanation:

These angles are congruent due to corresponding angles thm

3x + 21 = 6x - 60

3x - 6x = -60 - 21

-3x = -81

x = 27

3x + 21

3(27) + 21

81 + 21

102

8 0
3 years ago
Somebody please help ASAP!!!
Butoxors [25]
The answer is -6x+85

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 13.) –3(y+3)=2y+3<br> What is the answer to this
    6·2 answers
  • If Logx (1 / 8) = - 3 / 2, then x is equal to
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following algebraic expressions can be used to express the statement "one less than x squared?"
    13·2 answers
  • Need some math help please!
    10·2 answers
  • Please help whenever I do this i always get 306 but that's incorrect.
    15·2 answers
  • Factor the expression p2-16
    10·1 answer
  • Plz help me understand this question thankyou
    15·2 answers
  • Please help me, I'm suffering from all of these parallel lines ;9
    13·1 answer
  • Simplify the following expression: 7(2x+ 6y)​
    6·1 answer
  • The calories I burn walking can be modeled by the function y = 5x + 100,
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!