Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
To solve this equation by elimination, what you would do is multiply one of the equations by -1, or distribute -1 to each term in the equation, any of the 2 equations. Then align the equations and add them together.
-(X + 3y = 3)
-X - 3y = -3
-X - 3y = -3
X + 6y = 3
__________
3y = 0
y = 0/3 = 0.
Now we can solve for x, by simply plugging the value of y into any of the 2 equations.
X + 6y = 3
X + 6(0) = 3
X + 0 = 3
X = 3.
The solution to your system of equations would be (3,0).
Check this by plugging in the point to the other equation and see if it is true.
X + 3y = 3
(3) + 3(0) = 3
3 + 0 = 3
3 = 3.
Thus it is the solution.
Answer:
b.) 104
Step-by-step explanation:
Percent formula:
x/y = p/100
where x is the fraction, y is the total, and p is the percent
This means:
x = number of games the team won
y = total number of games
p = percent the number of teams won
Let's plug these values into the equation:
x/y = p/100
x/160 = 65/100
Solve by cross-multiplying:
x/160 = 65/100
100(x) = 100x
160(65) = 10,400
100x = 10,400
/100 /100
x = 104
Therefore, the team won 104 games.
The answer is (x,y) = (-2, 16)
do you need an explanation as well?
The answer is 8 because
8 times 4 = 32
8 times 7 =56
8 times 3 =24
56 minus 24 = 32
