Answer:
this one`s been up for debate for awhile now.
1. it depends on the organism
learning about an organism could be considered 'easier' to study in different ways. for example, if you are studying marine life, you will most likely have to keep it in a water habitat to watch it alive. If you are studying a land species, then watching from it`s natural habitat will give you more accurate results. sometimes the environment can affect an organisms internal systems more than you may think. this leads into my second point.
2. it depends on what you are trying to study
if you are trying to learn about the mating process, seasonal activity, migration, or external behavior, then monitoring it from it`s natural habitat or an area that is a close copy is your best option. but if you are looking into studying internal organs/systems or cells, then in <em>most</em> cases, the organism will need to be taken out of its natural habitat. only in very careful situations is it left in a habitat during examination.
Choice B:
More photosynthesis leads to more oxygen in the atmosphere and oceans.
Answer:there different because genetics are feactures pass on from your past decendents that you know own and heath factors are represent those things we can modify to improve the length and quality of life for residents.
Answer:
Deforestation can affect the water cycle and the carbon cycle. It will decrease the amount of transpiration. It will also increase the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by releasing the carbon dioxide as trees are burned and by decreasing photosynthesis.
Inhaling through the nose
