District of Columbia's gun control laws were the subject of a 2008 supreme court decision that ruled for an individual right to possess a firearm for lawful purposes.
What is the District of Columbia v. Heller case?
In the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 26, 2008, by a vote of 5 to 4, that the Second Amendment guarantees a person's right to own firearms without having to participate in a state militia and to use firearms for conventionally legal purposes, such as self-defense inside the home. The Second Amendment's interpretation was examined in this case for the first time since the United
The case known as District of Columbia v. Heller was first brought in 2003 in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. In Parker v. District of Columbia, six residents of the federal District of Columbia asked the court to block the implementation of three provisions of the district's Firearms Control Regulation Act (1975), which generally forbade the registration of handguns, forbade the carrying of unlicensed handguns or any other "deadly or dangerous" weapon that could be concealed, and demanded that legally stored firearms be disassembled or locked to prevent firing.
Know more about USA gun rights
brainly.com/question/3563382
#SPJ4
Answer:
C-Ample production for family.
Answer:
They were angered by the Goliad Massacre.
Explanation:
During the battle of Coleto, the Mexican army managed to capture hundreds of Texan soldiers. After the battle, the Mexican army drag those army and gathered them to Town called Goliad. Those soldiers were publicly executed for the locals to see under the order of Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna. Approximately, around 445 captives were massacred that day.
This angered a lot of Texans and increase the amount of people who wanted to be drafted as Texan troops to fight against the Mexican army.
